Fukuoka Stock Exchange exec arrested for taking upskirt photos

not so "secretly" then.... not only degenerate, but stupid, and a liar.... and 62! dear oh dear!

Their feet? I'll bet he couldn't describe their shoes if he had to - because he never even noticed them...

Sakai has denied the charge, and was quoted as telling the police, "I only took pictures of their feet."

At least the suspect is not very bright and could not even think about a more useful excuse, prosecutors will probably have an easy case here.

Nothing will happen to him.

Jail for the clown..

@ 62 one would think he learned by now, lol.

Another sexual deviant caught, good. How many innocent women and girls have become victims to this monster and what did he do with the photos he took?

Serious time inside is required and will act as a deterrent to others.

This is why Japan mandated the shutter sound.

I heard of a case in the Local Court where an old pervert would pay school boys returning from sport for their dirty sport socks.

Mum would ask ..."Hey Timmy, where's your footie socks "...yada yada ...thats how he was caught.

That’s why devices sold in Japan must have an audible shutter sound on the camera as default setting. Did the man have a sexless marriage (the story above as I write this)?

why don't female students just wear black tights under their skirts? Seems like an easy solution.

Two teenage girls on a train showing their underwear. Does it fit the description of an "upskirt photo"? So look but don't cross the line with a photo. How does this make sexual harassment?

C’mon on Wallace, it’s not acceptable to be taking photos of kids without parental consent and especially their underwear on a train!

Sakai was arrested so the cops charged him with something right?

kurisupisu

C’mon on Wallace, it’s not acceptable to be taking photos of kids without parental consent and especially their underwear on a train!

You can photo anyone in public. The girls were seated showing their underwear.

Sakai was arrested so the cops charged him with something right?

Yes, but you can be arrested without charge.

I would not take a photo like that.

You didn't answer my questions.

@wallace

How do you know what the girls were showing and doing at the time of the photography?

The police know exactly what the photos were of though as he was arrested.

You didn’t ask me a question mate…

kurisupisu

How do you know what the girls were showing and doing at the time of the photography?

Because it's in the article.

" is suspected of using a tablet to secretly take upskirt photos of the two 17-year-old girls sitting across from him on a train"

sitting opposite him on the train and he was able to photo their underwear. What other way is possible?

The police know exactly what the photos were of though as he was arrested.

Yes, photos of girls showing their underwear.

You didn’t ask me a question mate…

I asked a question in my comment which you responded to.

wallaceFeb. 13 01:08 pm JST

Two teenage girls on a train showing their underwear. Does it fit the description of an "upskirt photo"? So look but don't cross the line with a photo. How does this make sexual harassment?

Yes. It is an upskirt photo, because he took a photo up their skirt without their consent, so it is sexual harassment.

Why do the men on this site continually prove themselves to be both stupid and misogynistic, and the mods continue to let it happen.

This is why women chose the bear.

If they're showing it for free, then there's no cost

Maybe he has a foot fetish instead of a panty fetish, lol

why don't female students just wear black tights under their skirts? Seems like an easy solution.

Ah yes, it's their fault for being photographed without their consent and sexually harassed because of what they were wearing... /s

Let's remember who the real criminal is and why there are mandatory shutter sounds on Japanese phones.

Two teenage girls on a train showing their underwear. Does it fit the description of an "upskirt photo"? So look but don't cross the line with a photo. How does this make sexual harassment?

You cannot take a photo of someone without their consent, let alone a panty shot of a minor. Are you kidding me?

PSA: If you can see someone's underwear, treat it like when you see someone with their zipper open -- either ignore it or let them know with a gesture. Don't take a picture for crying out loud.

The law allows public photos of everyone. But you are not free to do whatever you like with it. If it is to be used in an advert it would require a model release. No consent is needed for public photos.

I would not be taking any photos of people travelling on trains.