Japan Today
Russian President Putin receives credentials of new foreign ambassadors in Moscow
Russian President Vladimir Putin delivers a speech during a ceremony to receive diplomatic credentials from newly appointed foreign ambassadors at the Grand Kremlin Palace in Moscow, Russia November 5, 2024. Yuri Kochetkov/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo Image: Reuters/Yuri Kochetkov
world

Kremlin says 'let's see' if Trump victory will help end Ukraine war

67 Comments
By Guy Faulconbridge, Dmitry Antonov and Andrew Osborn

The Kremlin reacted cautiously on Wednesday after Donald Trump victory in the U.S. presidential election, saying the U.S. was still a hostile state and that time would tell if Trump rhetoric on ending the Ukraine war translated into reality.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 triggered the biggest confrontation between Moscow and the West since the 1962 Cuban missile crisis when the Soviet Union and the U.S. came close to nuclear war.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Trump had made some important statements about wanting to end the Ukraine war during his campaign, but only time would tell if they lead to action.

"Let us not forget that we are talking about an unfriendly country, which is both directly and indirectly involved in a war against our state" (in Ukraine)," Peskov told reporters.

Peskov said he was not aware of any plans by President Vladimir Putin to congratulate Trump on his victory and that relations with Washington were at an historic low.

"We have repeatedly said that the U.S. is able to contribute to the end of this conflict. This cannot be done overnight, but... the U.S. is capable of changing the trajectory of its foreign policy. Will this happen, and if so, how ... we will see after (the U.S. president's inauguration in) January."

Russian and U.S. diplomats say relations between the world's two largest nuclear powers have only been worse during the depths of the Cold War. Russian officials from Putin down said ahead of the election that it made no difference to Moscow who won the White House, even as Kremlin-guided state media coverage showed a preference for Trump.

Kirill Dmitriev, the influential head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, said a Trump victory could be a chance to repair ties.

"This opens up new opportunities for resetting relations between Russia and the United States," added Dmitriev, a former Goldman Sachs banker who has previously had contacts with the Trump team.

In 2009, then U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton proposed a "reset" with Moscow, but due to an apparent translation error presented Moscow with a symbolic button labelled "overload" in Russian instead of "reset".

Despite the "reset", relations between Putin and then U.S. President Barack Obama soured.

WAR IN UKRAINE

Trump, 78, has promised to swiftly end the war in Ukraine if elected, though he has not explained exactly how he would do that.

Putin has said he is ready to talk about a possible end to the war, but that Russia's territorial gains and claims must be accepted, something that the Ukrainian leadership rejected as an unacceptable capitulation.

Russian forces are advancing at the fastest pace in at least a year in Ukraine and control about one fifth of the country.

That includes Crimea, which Moscow annexed from Ukraine in 2014, about 80% of the Donbas - a coal-and-steel zone - and more than 70% of the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions.

Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said on Wednesday that Trump's win would probably be bad news for Ukraine, which relies on Washington as its top military backer.

"Trump has one useful quality for us: as a businessman to the core, he mortally dislikes spending money on various hangers–on," Medvedev, now a senior security official, posted on his Telegram account.

"The question is how much Trump will be forced to give to the war. He's stubborn, but the system is stronger," he said.

© Thomson Reuters 2024.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.


67 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

We have repeatedly said that the U.S. is able to contribute to the end of this conflict. This cannot be done overnight

Wrong. Trump says he can end this war tomorrow. Even before he becomes president.

So, expect to withdraw from Ukraine. Trump said so.

-5 ( +3 / -8 )

76 days until the reveal of Trump's Ukraine strategy. I suspect there are things here that can tank even his reputation.

1 ( +8 / -7 )

Putin has said he is ready to talk about a possible end to the war, but that Russia's territorial gains and claims must be accepted, something that the Ukrainian leadership rejected as an unacceptable capitulation.

Neither Putin nor Trump can afford to make this demand of Free Ukraine. In Trump's case, what does he have to offer? Weapons for the war he is allegedly trying to end?

-2 ( +5 / -7 )

So, expect to withdraw from Ukraine. Trump said so.

I hope so

Neither Putin nor Trump can afford to make this demand of Free Ukraine. In Trump's case, what does he have to offer? Weapons for the war he is allegedly trying to end?

I am just happy that he will work to end this conflict and get us out of this and Zelenskyy out of our pockets.

-3 ( +7 / -10 )

bass4funk

So, expect Russia to withdraw from Ukraine. Trump said so.

I hope so

Don't hold your breath

Neither Putin nor Trump can afford to make this demand of Free Ukraine. In Trump's case, what does he have to offer? Weapons for the war he is allegedly trying to end?

I am just happy that he will work to end this conflict and get us out of this and Zelenskyy out of our pockets.

Neither will happen.

0 ( +4 / -4 )

Pray for Ukraine

-1 ( +4 / -5 )

End of the war in Ukraine between Trump & Putin equals appeasement.

If that happens, then Trump may as well change his last name to Chamberlain. Then you have to ask yourself, will appeasement become encouragement for Putin and other dictators.

-1 ( +5 / -6 )

NATO/EU will continue to support Ukraine.

2 ( +7 / -5 )

Russia will win and dictate terms.

This is as normal as gravity and nothing will change that.

Anything else would be an affront to public decency.

-2 ( +5 / -7 )

Don't hold your breath

I will

Neither Putin nor Trump can afford to make this demand of Free Ukraine. In Trump's case, what does he have to offer? Weapons for the war he is allegedly trying to end?

I am just happy that he will work to end this conflict and get us out of this and Zelenskyy out of our pockets.

Neither will happen.

I disagree

-2 ( +4 / -6 )

"Free Ukraine" is another propaganda construct.

There was nothing "free" for the victims burnt in Odessa.

0 ( +6 / -6 )

I am just happy that he will work to end this conflict and get us out of this and Zelenskyy out of our pockets.

Russia's handyman working from the West

0 ( +4 / -4 )

NATO/EU will continue to support Ukraine.

NATO is the US! The other members are tiny bit players with no real say in what NATO does.

In 2022 Russia expanded its military by 300,000 in six months. This expansion is more than the total combined military forces of the UK, France and Italy.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

Uh oh. Now Trump needs needs to figure out how to wiggle out of this promise.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Anyone who follows UN politics will know Moscow broadcast their last peace offer just 2 days ago.

It goes like this - everyday proxy Ukraine fights Russia, they lose more territory.

This means the February deal (of this year) is off the table and the price has risen.

It goes up every day, just like the price of eggs.

-3 ( +2 / -5 )

lets see how it will go.

UA have zero chance to win over Russia.

west tried their best for over decade still no results as expected.

lets take a seat around the table.when seriously ready for discussion and compromises.

earlier-better.

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

US arms manufacturers will try to cash in as much as they can until January, and turn Ukraine into a powder keg even more, that is what propelled Wall Street in the last two years and half after all. 

Then Trump will disengage in Eastern Europe and come to terms with Putin shrewd requests. Just a reminder that 4 American Trump voters out of 5 cant’t even find Ukraine on a map. The only one capable is a broker at Wall Street who is pretty satisfied already with his margins, and he is looking forward to more hostilities and orders from the Middle East carnage and Taiwan’s destabilizing project, between now and the 20 of January.

-1 ( +3 / -4 )

Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

Proxy war against Russia was a stupid game and the 'prize' (penalty) will be permanent loss of territory.

0 ( +5 / -5 )

Russia's handyman working from the West

No, just calling out facts.

0 ( +5 / -5 )

Trump can't do anything until VP Harris presides over a joint session of Congress in Jan of next year to validate the election results.

That will be her final act.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

VP Harris presides over a joint session of Congress in Jan of next year to validate the election results.

but but she can refuse to do so!

oh wait, after Mike Pence failed America in doing nothing? Democrats passed a law saying she has to validate her own loss, zero exceptions.

boomerang.

0 ( +5 / -5 )

JJEToday  08:09 am JST

Russia will win and dictate terms.

This is as normal as gravity and nothing will change that.

Anything else would be an affront to public decency.

Russia doesn't have the bodies lined up and hasn't had any decency since 2008 or thereabouts.

"Free Ukraine" is another propaganda construct.

There was nothing "free" for the victims burnt in Odessa.

I guess that totally justifies the murder and displacement of millions.

Anyone who follows UN politics will know Moscow broadcast their last peace offer just 2 days ago.

It goes like this - everyday proxy Ukraine fights Russia, they lose more territory.

This means the February deal (of this year) is off the table and the price has risen.

It goes up every day, just like the price of eggs.

A request for total surrender is the whole ball of wax unless Putin is also planning a genocide now. Imagine if Netanyahu made a similar demand for an apt comparison. But Putin has no right to live as a human anymore as it is.

Play stupid games win stupid prizes.

Proxy war against Russia was a stupid game and the 'prize' (penalty) will be permanent loss of territory.

Copypasta strikes again!!! What stunning wit. The astute will note that the horde state started this war and there was nothing Ukraine could have done to prevent such savagery from being inflicted on it. Only the Russian believes in receiving goodies for his misbehavior.

Trump can't do anything until VP Harris presides over a joint session of Congress in Jan of next year to validate the election results.

That will be her final act.

Disappointed she will have to lead of life a comfort with book deals and TV appearances?

-6 ( +1 / -7 )

Mr KiplingToday  08:24 am JST

NATO/EU will continue to support Ukraine.

NATO is the US! The other members are tiny bit players with no real say in what NATO does.

In 2022 Russia expanded its military by 300,000 in six months. This expansion is more than the total combined military forces of the UK, France and Italy.

The EU's gdp is 10x that of russia. I know russian children are being taught the finer points of shell assembly these days, but the EU can still outlast them.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Go you one better. It entitles the south-east to secede and chart their own path.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

The United States played a key role in generating an perpetuating this terrible conflict in Ukraine, starting way before Euromaidan protests in 2013, and the Victoria Nuland misdeeds, widely documented. Now Putin will dictate his own requests, whether we like it or not. This election result in the US is a great opportunity for Europe to start disengaging from Washington on a diplomatic level and economically.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

its simple

UA neutral status.no NATO member.

all foreign boots out of UA incl mercenaries.

bring back russian language to schools and cultural institutions as was for decades.guarantee freedom of speech and all rights for all UA citizens of all manirities.

0 ( +4 / -4 )

FosToday 10:07 am JST

The United States played a key role in generating an perpetuating this terrible conflict in Ukraine, starting way before Euromaidan protests in 2013, and the Victoria Nuland misdeeds, widely documented. Now Putin will dictate his own requests, whether we like it or not. This election result in the US is a great opportunity for Europe to start disengaging from Washington on a diplomatic level and economically.

yes.

West have to admit that UA "case" was a very bad investment.Keep in mind that american made rockets are killing russian citizens.Whitehouse went a bit too far.

-2 ( +2 / -4 )

dobre vam zajebava

its simple

UA neutral status.no NATO member.

Zelensky won't allow that. The west must provide security guarantees to Ukraine before there will be peace.

So if Trump promises membership of NATO, he may be able to keep his promise to end the war.

Otherwise he will fail. Just like he failed to build the wall.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Fos

The United States played a key role in generating an perpetuating this terrible conflict in Ukraine, starting way before Euromaidan protests in 2013, and the Victoria Nuland misdeeds, widely documented.

Pray tell... Send links!

Now Putin will dictate his own requests, whether we like it or not. 

He can dictate all he wants. Ukraine doesn't have to listen.

This election result in the US is a great opportunity for Europe to start disengaging from Washington on a diplomatic level and economically.

That doesn't make any sense.

-3 ( +1 / -4 )

Putin is in the driver's seat. This is what certain quarters fail to observe.

Zelensky is back to more begging.

A neutralist west-Ukraine rump state is the only way out of this.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

2020hindsights aka Underworld

Zelensky won't allow that. The west must provide security guarantees to Ukraine before there will be peace.

So if Trump promises membership of NATO, he may be able to keep his promise to end the war.

Now Putin will dictate his own requests, whether we like it or not. 

He can dictate all he wants. Ukraine doesn't have to listen.

This election result in the US is a great opportunity for Europe to start disengaging from Washington on a diplomatic level and economically.

That doesn't make any sense.

Correct.ALL ABOVE does not make any sense aka all comments are OFF TOPIC/using local vocabulary/.

Just to be correct-my reply to you is not rude/impolite one.

You have better to stop spamming here with all of this nonsense.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Underworld

Pray tell... Send links!

Sure man. As I said before the United States played a key role in generating an perpetuating this terrible conflict in Ukraine, starting way before Euromaidan protests in 2013. And this is Victoria Nuland transcripts. Certainly you cannot say The Guardian is Russian propaganda. 

Nuland was the Spokesperson for the United States Department of State at the time in case someone wonders the nature and scope of interests of Washington in Ukraine. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/feb/07/eu-us-diplomat-victoria-nuland-phonecall-leaked-video

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

Kremlin says 'let's see' if Trump victory will help end Ukraine war

What else do the media expect him to say? If he says more than that, he will get bashed no matter what.

In the event, in previous interviews he said he would prefer Harris, which is understandable.... a weak and disintegrating US is preferrable to rival superpowers to a Maga situation.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

TaiwanIsNot

Neither Putin nor Trump can afford to make this demand of Free Ukraine. In Trump's case, what does he have to offer? Weapons for the war he is allegedly trying to end?

Trump works with financial incentives and disincentives, as you have seen before, and not with military adventures like the neocons/neolibs. And a "free Ukraine" should be free of US bases and missiles, which is at the center of this conflict. As so many senior diplomats have explained over the years.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Fos

Pray tell... Send links!

Sure man. As I said before the United States played a key role in generating an perpetuating this terrible conflict in Ukraine, starting way before Euromaidan protests in 2013. And this is Victoria Nuland transcripts. Certainly you cannot say The Guardian is Russian propaganda. 

One problem Fos. That transcripts was after 2013.

Nuland was the Spokesperson for the United States Department of State at the time in case someone wonders the nature and scope of interests of Washington in Ukraine. 

Yup. Standard foreign policy stuff.

Now let's look at Russia's involvement. Oh, they annexed Crimea and started a war in the Donbas.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Zaphod

Neither Putin nor Trump can afford to make this demand of Free Ukraine. In Trump's case, what does he have to offer? Weapons for the war he is allegedly trying to end?

Trump works with financial incentives and disincentives, as you have seen before, and not with military adventures like the neocons/neolibs. And a "free Ukraine" should be free of US bases and missiles, which is at the center of this conflict. As so many senior diplomats have explained over the years.

Nope. A free Ukraine needs security guarantees.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

JJEToday  09:57 am JST

Go you one better. It entitles the south-east to secede and chart their own path.

Only the russian believes there is ever a justification for criminal behavior.

A neutralist west-Ukraine rump state is the only way out of this.

Yeah, if the russian defines the "rump state" down to the 80% Ukraine controls. This is the only workable solution.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

TaiwanIsNotChinaToday  07:12 am JST

76 days until the reveal of Trump's Ukraine strategy. I suspect there are things here that can tank even his reputation.

As for an end to this war, forget it. Sputnik Don will kissy up to Putin again because he's a Fuehrer for America but a yes-man to Putin.

And we are all screwed.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

ZaphodToday  11:26 am JST

And a "free Ukraine" should be free of US bases and missiles, which is at the center of this conflict.

There are no US bases or icbms in Ukraine, as we keep having to explain to our gaslighting contributors.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

FosToday  10:07 am JST

The United States played a key role in generating an perpetuating this terrible conflict in Ukraine, starting way before Euromaidan protests in 2013, and the Victoria Nuland misdeeds, widely documented. Now Putin will dictate his own requests, whether we like it or not. This election result in the US is a great opportunity for Europe to start disengaging from Washington on a diplomatic level and economically.

Sure man. As I said before the United States played a key role in generating an perpetuating this terrible conflict in Ukraine, starting way before Euromaidan protests in 2013. And this is Victoria Nuland transcripts. Certainly you cannot say The Guardian is Russian propaganda. 

Nuland was the Spokesperson for the United States Department of State at the time in case someone wonders the nature and scope of interests of Washington in Ukraine. 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2014/feb/07/eu-us-diplomat-victoria-nuland-phonecall-leaked-video

Tanks only rolling one way on Feb. 24th. 2022. This simple fact defeats all attempts to deflect blame from where it obviously belongs.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

dobre vam zajebavaToday  10:08 am JST

its simple

UA neutral status.no NATO member.

all foreign boots out of UA incl mercenaries.

bring back russian language to schools and cultural institutions as was for decades.guarantee freedom of speech and all rights for all UA citizens of all manirities.

The russian bodies expended so far maybe buys you the last item. You can't have what you aren't willing to pay for.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

burgers and beers

I am just happy that he will work to end this conflict and get us out of this and Zelenskyy out of our pockets..................Neither will happen."

It will happen. Many in the warmonger camp will not be happy with it though.

Nope. Trump coming to power doesn't change the conflict. It may cut money from the US, but that will just mean more lives lost.

And BTW, you are in the warmonger camp.

"End of the war in Ukraine between Trump & Putin equals appeasement."

That is what you want to believe. Others see end of the war for what it is - peace and an end to unnecessary loss of even more lives.

That's not what the experts think, however. Because, all it means is Russia stops regroups and tries again in 3 years. It doesn't bring peace. Only security guarantees bring peace.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Underworld 

Standard foreign policy stuff.

Maybe in your world of American diplomacy. They are a guest of Europe and they need to watch their language. The US administration cannot decide the destiny of countries by waging wars to please the interests of the US corporations and Wall Street investors. Simple as that.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Fos

Standard foreign policy stuff.

Maybe in your world of American diplomacy. They are a guest of Europe and they need to watch their language.

It was a private conversation.

The US administration cannot decide the destiny of countries by waging wars to please the interests of the US corporations and Wall Street investors. Simple as that.

And they don't.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

Underworld

And they don't.

Without going back to 2013 then, only this year the US administration has given $19 billions worth of lethal weapons to Israel, to support the IDF’s heinous campaign in the Middle East, and, as JT widely reported, only in the last month $12 billions in arm sales were approved by the Pentagon to - in order - Japan, Taiwan and South Korea, turning the Asian continent into a powder keg. Which, frankly, we do not need .

1 ( +3 / -2 )

There are no US bases or icbms in Ukraine, as we keep having to explain to our gaslighting contributors.

Explain to your "contributors" what has NATO built in Ochakov? Now this base has been bombed by Russians and is of no interest. But tell what it was in 2022

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Putin is in the driver's seat. This is what certain quarters fail to observe.

To the point, today Putin will give a big speech on the forum Valdai. Don't miss it:)

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

Fos

And they don't.

Without going back to 2013 then, only this year the US administration has given $19 billions worth of lethal weapons to Israel, to support the IDF’s heinous campaign in the Middle East, and, as JT widely reported, only in the last month $12 billions in arm sales were approved by the Pentagon to - in order - Japan, Taiwan and South Korea,

Off topic.

turning the Asian continent into a powder keg. Which, frankly, we do not need .

Really? I don't think so.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Primusinter

Putin is in the driver's seat. This is what certain quarters fail to observe.

To the point, today Putin will give a big speech on the forum Valdai. Don't miss it:)

Yawn.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Primusinter

Explain to your "contributors" what has NATO built in Ochakov? 

Again, a clear evidence that we need to fight the disinformation of the US administration whose interests will be deeply affected in Ukraine with Trump victory. For a greater good.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Underworld

Off topic.

Sure, whenever is convenient, right? Over 30 billions in arm sales by the US administration between Middle East and Asia only in 2024, and you say Washington does not decide the destiny of countries by waging wars?

As reminder, the US spends almost 45% of global military spending. More than the next 26 countries combined, 25 of whom are allies. Get the facts straight.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Again, a clear evidence that we need to fight the disinformation of the US administration

In Ukraine, with the support of the CIA, a network of 12 secret bases has been created along the border with Russia, the New York Times reported. This is old news. The year is 2021. And currently, Ukraine is a solid American training ground and many secret American points from where intelligence is collected for precise strikes on Russian territory. Even Ukrainian military and officials are not allowed to enter many of these points. I would have told you more, but J would delete it anyway....

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Primusinter

Again, a clear evidence that we need to fight the disinformation of the US administration

In Ukraine, with the support of the CIA, a network of 12 secret bases has been created along the border with Russia, the New York Times reported. This is old news. The year is 2021. 

Oh you mean after Russia annexes Crimea and starts a war in the Donbas.

Which is worse? You decide.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

According to your own media reports, the fact that the territory of Ukraine was covered with military training grounds, biological laboratories and other secret points of NATO (America is meant) served as one of the main reasons for the start of the Special Military Operation...We all know too little about what is going on to judge Putin...

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Preparations for the construction of the base began back in the 90s. It was originally planned to place it in Sevastopol. Naturally, the Russian population of Sevastopol was against it. This plan, in fact, began the displacement of the Russian Black Sea fleet from Sevastopol. So, as Russians say, "get a grenade, fascist."..

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Primusinter

According to your own media reports, the fact that the territory of Ukraine was covered with military training grounds,

Defense.

biological laboratories

Please...

and other secret points of NATO (America is meant) served as one of the main reasons for the start of the Special Military Operation...

Nope. I love how you try to bend the narrative about how Russia had to invade. The had already annexed Crimea. Ukraine posed no threat. They were just trying to improve their own defense.

Russia has nukes. Ukraine doesn't. Who is the target here? If Ukraine invades Russia they get nuked. If Russia invades Ukraine, they don't get nuked. And you are trying to say that Russia felt vulnerable? Come on!

We all know too little about what is going on to judge Putin...

Nope. We know it enough to determine the victim.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

TaiwanisChina...

Yeah, if the russian defines the "rump state" down to the 80% Ukraine controls. This is the only workable solution.

Its now closer to 25% and growing everyday. And that new Russia has over 40% of old Ukraine's industry and minerals.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Mr Kipling

Its now closer to 25% and growing everyday. And that new Russia has over 40% of old Ukraine's industry and minerals.

Oh, so now it is imperialism?

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Humankind and Planet Earth are thirsting for peace. "Non-violence is a weapon of the strong" - Mahatma Gandhi

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Bottom lime is perhaps next time the likes of George W. Bush or Condolezza Rice will stick to their promises and think twice before proceeding to enlarge NATO eastward, I am sure Donald Trump will know better this time :)

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Underworld

Oh, so now it is imperialism?

Thats a good one coming from the US front :) Let’s no even go there the last 49 years and counting of Washington undercover activities

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Fos

Bottom lime is perhaps next time the likes of George W. Bush or Condolezza Rice will stick to their promises

What promises? What treaties?

and think twice before proceeding to enlarge NATO eastward,

The only reason this is happening is because nuclear-armed Russia is threatening its neighbors, they want to be part of a defensive alliance.

I am sure Donald Trump will know better this time :)

Donald is clueless on foreign policy.

-2 ( +0 / -2 )

Fos

Oh, so now it is imperialism?

Thats a good one coming from the US front :)

Why do you need yo involve the US in every argument? I'm not from there and I don't endorse them.

Let’s no even go there the last 49 years and counting of Washington undercover activities

Whatever. This war has nothing to do with the US. They are just supporting the victim in Russia's imperialism.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites