Japan Today
world

Taipei says Chinese aircraft carrier group sailed through Taiwan Strait

49 Comments
By Joy Chiang and Amber Wang

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© 2024 AFP

©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.

49 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

Whether its with a couple of LRASMs, a few "Quicksinks", or a Mark 48 ADCAP, that Chinese carrier is a dead man sailing...

2 ( +9 / -7 )

Important to observe non-UN recognized Taiwan province has no legitimate claim to the Taiwan Strait.

Also, this is the ex-Soviet carrier Varyag, which was sold off by independent Ukraine to China. Relevant to observe they sold off lots of things on the international arms markets over the years to certain quarters. What an irony.

-11 ( +5 / -16 )

So much bravado. On the other hand Chinese aircraft in bases in Fujian and Zhejiang are just a few minutes away on afterburner to Taiwan. Geography matter.

Whether its with a couple of LRASMs, a few "Quicksinks", or a Mark 48 ADCAP, that Chinese carrier is a dead man sailing...

Having said that let peace prevail for Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. Liaoning is headed back to port in Shandong NE China, simply sailing off of the Chinese coast.

-2 ( +7 / -9 )

Chinese ship sailing in Chinese and international waters. Slow news day?

-3 ( +9 / -12 )

As I have always stated , China will not take Taiwan by a military force, they will just consume it if not already have. Too may eyes are watchin China so they will just do it covertly.

-8 ( +3 / -11 )

China supports a war against the country that sold the ship to them.

1 ( +7 / -6 )

Yeah I mean it’s like leftists here think these things are unmanned or something.

not staffed by regular young people serving their country at sea who have loving family.

People who in no way, shape or form deserve to be attacked and sunk to the ocean floor when there isn’t even a war.

just cause “the Soviets” made it. Now leftists even have hate for inanimate objects- not just people.

(Super inconvenient that Ukraine sold it to them though)

-10 ( +4 / -14 )

staffed by regular young people serving their country at sea who have loving family.

People who in no way, shape or form deserve to be attacked and sunk to the ocean floor when there isn’t even a war.

Oh, cry more, comrade.

You really are working hard for your CCP.

4 ( +11 / -7 )

BlacklabelToday 03:56 pm JST

staffed by regular young people serving their country

Actually, no they're not serving their country. The PLA serves the Chinese Communist Party, not the country/people of China. It does not pledge allegiance to China the country.

And so, if the CCP orders the PLA to attack the people of China, that's what it does (cf. Tiananmen massacre and many other instances).

2 ( +7 / -5 )

China considers Taiwan to be part of its territory and has ramped up military activity around the island in recent years to pressure Taipei into accepting its claims of sovereignty.

Taiwan will never willingly accept PRC sovereignty over it. Clearly the only way for China to take control of Taiwan and its people is through war, occupation and annexation. A large number of people on both sides will die as a result of Xi's ambitions of Empire and becoming the first modern day Emperor of China.

Important to observe non-UN recognized Taiwan province has no legitimate claim to the Taiwan Strait.

Important to observe that PRC China a former non UN-recognized province of Taiwan (ROC) has no legitimate claim to international waters in the Taiwan strait. Nor does it have any legitimate claim to Taiwan and its population for as long as they wish to remain free.

2 ( +6 / -4 )

You really are working hard for your CCP.

Yes, it is because their are best friend with trump.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

They can take their ski jump through. It is international waters.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

Christopher

War is coming. Taiwan wants no part of China. And Taiwan is prepared to fight it out.

China is nothing but a greedy bully.

War is already here, but it is not and will not be a shooting war about Taiwan, unless the US makes it so. Of course Peking wants to rule Taiwan, but their way is slow pressure and influence. It is sad that American politicians and media see the every conflict as a military one problem to be solved with their bombs and aircraft carriers.

-4 ( +3 / -7 )

So, somebody wants us to be alarmed that a Chinese aircraft carrier sailed through Chinese waters, after taking part in a Chinese exercise which practiced for exercising Chinese sovereignty over what is internationally recognized Chinese territory.

-4 ( +4 / -8 )

ZaphodToday 06:08 pm JST

It is sad that American politicians and media see the every conflict as a military one problem to be solved with their bombs and aircraft carriers.

They clearly don't. Perhaps you have missed all the diplomacy and legislation related to Taiwan, like the Taiwan Relations Act, Taiwan Travel Act, TAIPEI Act, etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Relations_Act

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Travel_Act

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_Allies_International_Protection_and_Enhancement_Initiative_Act

Even right down to things like ensuring maps are accurate, and do not wrongly depict Taiwan as part of the PRC:

https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/news/4468061

3 ( +6 / -3 )

So let me get this right. China sends ships a few miles from its land and the usual JT suspects cry foul and have a hissy fit. But when ships sail from half way round the world and go through a narrow strait right next to China, they're beating their chests and singing hallelujah? Last time I checked, the Taiwan Strait was located in between Mainland China and Taiwan. Let's see how the warmongers like it if Chinese ships sailed near Florida or California. 800 US military bases around the world, many with weapons pointing at China, and US is the good guy? Mon oeil.

-6 ( +3 / -9 )

Nice big fat target for the new carrier based stand-off munitions.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

Yeah I mean it’s like leftists here think these things are unmanned or something.

Ih the irony of a Putin lover calling the opponents of Communist expansion “leftists”.

staffed by regular young people serving their country

Actually, no they're not serving their country. The PLA serves the Chinese Communist Party, not the country/people of China. It does not pledge allegiance to China the country.

True and an irony multiplier.

7 ( +8 / -1 )

*Over the weekend, a U.S. and a Canadian warship passed through the 180-kilometer Taiwan Strait, part of regular passages by Washington and its allies meant to reinforce its status as an international waterway.*

Yes, international. China is a nation. Need we say more? It's not smart for posters to fan the flames of hatred unnecessarily. Shocked to find myself in agreement with Blacklabel & Zaphod about something. Everyone needs to try a bit harder to stay calm these days.

-2 ( +4 / -6 )

Richard Pearce -

So, somebody wants us to be alarmed that a Chinese aircraft carrier sailed through Chinese waters

The Taiwan Strait is NOT "Chinese waters."

Plrase, try to keep up.

4 ( +8 / -4 )

This is a pure clickbait story. Not even Taiwan is protesting the passage of this ship. They just want us to click and bicker in the comments.

So, somebody wants us to be alarmed that a Chinese aircraft carrier sailed through Chinese waters, after taking part in a Chinese exercise which practiced for exercising Chinese sovereignty over what is internationally recognized Chinese territory

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

The title should be "Chinese ship sails through Chinese waters" (Taiwan Strait).

-9 ( +0 / -9 )

Oh Lord. The sheer lack of comprehension here, either legitimate or feigned so as to advance the agenda of certain dictatorial regional powers is staggering, but let's spell it out.

This is a big deal because China has repeatedly threatened to take Taiwan by force, Xi has told his military to prepare for war by 2027, and constant Chinese wargames and routine aerial intrusions occur with regularity around the island.

This idea, as if "Hurr durr it's just like if the US sailed an CAG past Mexico! hurr durr" is just laughable; it would only be comparable if the US was actively speaking of invading Mexico, telling their military to prepare for war with Mexico , viewed Mexico as their perosnal property, and was actively planning an invasion of Mexico.

This goes for any military, anywhere. It's a big deal when you rumble your warships past the land you yourself say you are going to take back by force

So, yes, when an authoritarian regime who is rapidly expanding their armed forces and openly speaks of preparing for war to invade an island nation a few hundred miles from their border sails their premier warship nearby...it's not like you going on your Norweigan CruiseLines cruise to the Med. The naivete here is astounding.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

The title should be "Chinese ship sails through Chinese waters" (Taiwan Strait).

But then it would be wrong wouldn't it. Taiwan Strait being international waters and all.

4 ( +4 / -0 )

JJEOct. 23 03:01 pm JST

The title should be "Chinese ship sails through Chinese waters" (Taiwan Strait).

But it is not Chinese waters.

Important to observe non-UN recognized Taiwan province has no legitimate claim to the Taiwan Strait.

Important to observe Taiwan has more recognition than russia's disgraces and nobody has claim to the Taiwan Strait.

Also, this is the ex-Soviet carrier Varyag, which was sold off by independent Ukraine to China. Relevant to observe they sold off lots of things on the international arms markets over the years to certain quarters. What an irony.

They didn't know they needed to keep their weapons to fend off heinous assaults.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

BlacklabelOct. 23 03:56 pm JST

Yeah I mean it’s like leftists here think these things are unmanned or something.

not staffed by regular young people serving their country at sea who have loving family.

People who in no way, shape or form deserve to be attacked and sunk to the ocean floor when there isn’t even a war.

just cause “the Soviets” made it. Now leftists even have hate for inanimate objects- not just people.

(Super inconvenient that Ukraine sold it to them though)

Do we need a good relationship with China and to be friends again? Show us how far you have come, Mr. MAGA.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

RichardPearceOct. 23 06:47 pm JST

So, somebody wants us to be alarmed that a Chinese aircraft carrier sailed through Chinese waters, after taking part in a Chinese exercise which practiced for exercising Chinese sovereignty over what is internationally recognized Chinese territory.

Sources that even a majority recognize Taiwan as part of China? Many take the US position of merely acknowledging the claim and not taking an opinion on it.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

When mainland China has non-UN recognized Taiwan province reunify with it, Beijing will have a rock-solid claim to the Taiwan Strait. Their case right now is suitably strong, just as strong as the 11/9 dash line claim.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

JJEToday 01:27 am JST

When mainland China has non-UN recognized Taiwan province reunify with it, Beijing will have a rock-solid claim to the Taiwan Strait.

I'm glad you used the term "rock-solid" because rocks do not generate baseline:

Article121

Regime of islands

An island is a naturally formed area of land, surrounded by water, which is above water at high tide.

Except as provided for in paragraph 3, the territorial sea, the contiguous zone, the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf of an island are determined in accordance with the provisions of this Convention applicable to other land territory.

Rocks which cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own shall have no exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.

Their case right now is suitably strong, just as strong as the 11/9 dash line claim.

So not at all. Got it.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Foreign vessel passage of the Taiwan Strait must adhere to this UNCLOS provision.

UNCLOS Article 38 - Right of Transit Passage - as it applies to a strait reads:

Transit passage means the exercise in accordance with this Part of

the freedom of navigation and overflight solely for the purpose of continuous

and expeditious transit of the strait between one part of the high seas or an

exclusive economic zone and another part of the high seas or an exclusive

economic zone. 

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

deanzaZZRToday 02:09 am JST

Foreign vessel passage of the Taiwan Strait must adhere to this UNCLOS provision.

Not territorial sea so doesn't apply.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

Certain quarters forget that non-UN recogniced Taiwan province includes a series of islands scattered on both sides of the strait. When these are returned to Beijing, along with the province, the strait will be Chinese (even though it is already).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_islands_of_Taiwan#/media/File:Kinmen,Matsu,Wuciou.png

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

JJEToday 03:10 am JST

Certain quarters forget that non-UN recogniced Taiwan province includes a series of islands scattered on both sides of the strait. When these are returned to Beijing, along with the province, the strait will be Chinese (even though it is already).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_islands_of_Taiwan#/media/File:Kinmen,Matsu,Wuciou.png

Certain quarters should observe that there is more than 28 nm separating all the islands in the strait and the PRC will never be an achepelagic state.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

Richard Pearce -

It'll be interesting what changes in the next 3 months.

You could see what's left of the Ukrainian population under Zelensky's control in mass revolt when it is clear that there will be no more arms shipments from NATO, no 'International Brigade' 'recruits' arriving fully trained by NATO militaries they're officially retired from.

You could see the population of Taipei in revolt against the government of 'Taiwan' because they have been cut off from NATO support by the implosion of NATO.

You could see blackouts in Japan due to the lack of oil imported from Iran.

Basically, all the things Richard Pearce is hoping for. But won't get.

I'm just shocked that, for once, you haven't wrapped it all up as some sort of "Zionist conspiracy".

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Yeah I mean it’s like leftists here think these things are unmanned or something.

not staffed by regular young people serving their country at sea who have loving family.

People who in no way, shape or form deserve to be attacked and sunk to the ocean floor when there isn’t even a war.

just cause “the Soviets” made it. Now leftists even have hate for inanimate objects- not just people.

Well this is not surprising - our far-right friends after groveling to Putin, are now groveling to Xi...

Tomorrow they'll be groveling to the Ayatollah...

Seems there's no America-hating dictator they won't bow down to...

2 ( +3 / -1 )

China considers Taiwan to be part of its territory and has ramped up military activity around the island in recent years to pressure Taipei into accepting its claims of sovereignty.

It's Aesop's fable of the Sun and the Wind. The sun is going to make the man take off his cloak himself instead of the wind.

It's obvious Xi is the sun and the PLA Navy the wind. They're not going to do anything but serve warnings, but if Lai ignores warnings Taiwan knows what's coming.

Economic incentives will win over war.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

They didn't know they needed to keep their weapons to fend off heinous assaults.

So when is the war starting? I told you two years ago there is no war and there won't be any wars. The war's front line is at the BRICS summit not the Taiwan Straights. They have you looking in the wrong places.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

In the event of war, even if the US came to the rescue and were capable of intercepting the Chinese missiles - this is a question for our resident naval warfare expert - how many interceptors would the US fleet have and how long would that last? They would simply run out of interceptor in time.

China is able to produce 1000 missiles a day it is said. I seriously doubt it is that low. You would have to anticipate that to be higher.

So then how about underwater? China has quite a number (use Western intelligence to form your opinion) of underwater drones. How about the USS Connecticut that hit an underwater mountain due to human error?

Americans are to believe the US Navy is so incompetent that its submarine would hit a seamount and become incapacitated. They are also averse to believing any country could cripple a Seawolf-class nuclear powered fast attack submarine and send it back home to San Diego. Pick your poison.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

When mainland China has non-UN recognized Taiwan province reunify with it,

Which will never happen.

Beijing will have a rock-solid claim to the Taiwan Strait.

Which will never happen. Twelve miles from each side and all water in between is international waters for free travel.

Their case right now is suitably strong, just as strong as the 11/9 dash line claim.

Agreed, and that 11 dash mostly 9 dash line has exactly zero existence in reality. If I made such a personal claim with dashes on a map it would hold precisely identical weight as China's claim. China better hope I dont press my claim.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

quercetumToday 02:21 pm JST

China considers Taiwan to be part of its territory and has ramped up military activity around the island in recent years to pressure Taipei into accepting its claims of sovereignty.

It's Aesop's fable of the Sun and the Wind. The sun is going to make the man take off his cloak himself instead of the wind.

It's obvious Xi is the sun and the PLA Navy the wind. They're not going to do anything but serve warnings, but if Lai ignores warnings Taiwan knows what's coming.

Economic incentives will win over war.

No free country has ever just handed itself over to an invader. Tell us how China is going to get the 6x growth to look so appealing that Taiwan will just empty itself into boats. A blockade will be an act of war just as if a shot were fired by Peking first. Also your sun is pretty disgusting so I guess it is good no one can look at it.

They didn't know they needed to keep their weapons to fend off heinous assaults.

So when is the war starting? I told you two years ago there is no war and there won't be any wars.

I know and I guess you will be right until you are wrong. Good for the rest of us for Taiwan to remain independent and ww3 averted.

In the event of war,

You just told us there would be no war and expected that to sound like common sense. You really need to make up your mind.

even if the US came to the rescue and were capable of intercepting the Chinese missiles - this is a question for our resident naval warfare expert - how many interceptors would the US fleet have and how long would that last? They would simply run out of interceptor in time.

Are you going to tell you are not going to destroy Taiwan with said missiles? Are you under the impression the US can't fire back with air power so the ships can remain out of harms way? Are you under the impression China won't need any boats in the water?

China is able to produce 1000 missiles a day it is said. I seriously doubt it is that low. You would have to anticipate that to be higher.

Yes, and russia claims to be on a complete war footing economically. I hear they gained a new village this month.

So then how about underwater? China has quite a number (use Western intelligence to form your opinion) of underwater drones.

Good for you. Hope they don't sink like the sub this spring. I suspect the drones don't have much larger range than missiles.

How about the USS Connecticut that hit an underwater mountain due to human error?

Are you under the impression the sea floor will win the war for you?

Americans are to believe the US Navy is so incompetent that its submarine would hit a seamount and become incapacitated.

Well we are not going to believe the musings of those in the employ of the CCP.

They are also averse to believing any country could cripple a Seawolf-class nuclear powered fast attack submarine and send it back home to San Diego. Pick your poison.

No evidence to assume Peking did anything original ever.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

Agreed, and that 11 dash mostly 9 dash line has exactly zero existence in reality. If I made such a personal claim with dashes on a map it would hold precisely identical weight as China's claim. China better hope I dont press my claim.

During WWII, the US participated in the write-up of the 1943 Cairo Declaration and 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. In 1947, US warships accompanied Chinese warships to reclaim the South China Seas island and reefs that were colonized by Japan during the war. The 11 dash line, and later 9 dash line as China worked things out with Vietnam, was recognized.

I "press" your claim.

At the very least you would have to admit this is not the imagination or some random drawing by ROC Taiwan. This is the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation. The PRC did not participate in this. The PRC only claims this through Taiwan, that it claims as its province.

Are you arguing that the UNCLOS repeals the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation? That is not an argument. We merely look it up or use common sense: it does not.

For the commentators who say "China signed the UNCLOS" please explain how the UNCLOS is an undoing of the Cairo and Potsdam? It does not and the two declaration and proclamations are not repealed.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Are you under the impression the sea floor will win the war for you?

Are you under the impression the seamount crippled the USS Connecticut? That's a good one.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

I know and I guess you will be right until you are wrong. Good for the rest of us for Taiwan to remain independent and ww3 averted.

Yes, definitely I am right here. They will continue to give warnings. The live-fire exercises are to make sure the Republic of China does not get any wrong ideas and to make sure there will not be war.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

 Hope they don't sink like the sub this spring.

You've been fooled. That part of the Yangtze River is only 5-6 meters deep and there are sandbars. It's not a place for nuclear subs.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

quercetumToday 03:20 pm JST

Agreed, and that 11 dash mostly 9 dash line has exactly zero existence in reality. If I made such a personal claim with dashes on a map it would hold precisely identical weight as China's claim. China better hope I dont press my claim.

During WWII, the US participated in the write-up of the 1943 Cairo Declaration and 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. In 1947, US warships accompanied Chinese warships to reclaim the South China Seas island and reefs that were colonized by Japan during the war. The 11 dash line, and later 9 dash line as China worked things out with Vietnam, was recognized.

I "press" your claim.

That doesn't say anything about whether the US or China allowed piracy to operate out of the ROC islands.

At the very least you would have to admit this is not the imagination or some random drawing by ROC Taiwan. This is the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation. The PRC did not participate in this. The PRC only claims this through Taiwan, that it claims as its province.

And since the PRC is allegedly an independent country, it is behaving appallingly by engaging in piracy and hiding behind the ROC as an excuse.

Are you arguing that the UNCLOS repeals the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation? That is not an argument. We merely look it up or use common sense: it does not.

For the commentators who say "China signed the UNCLOS" please explain how the UNCLOS is an undoing of the Cairo and Potsdam? It does not and the two declaration and proclamations are not repealed.

I imagine the UNCLOS doesn't say anything about who owns whatever minicule amount of the rocks is above water. It merely states that these remain international waters and China can't do anything to ships any distance from its rocks.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

quercetumToday 03:23 pm JST

Are you under the impression the sea floor will win the war for you?

Are you under the impression the seamount crippled the USS Connecticut? That's a good one.

Even if we take your fanfiction at face value, the US now has a boat load of survivors and equipment with which to devise countermeasures.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

Their case right now is suitably strong, just as strong as the 11/9 dash line claim.

So not at all. Got it.

The 11 /9 dash line is a US doing not China's. There wasn't even a Philippines sovereign nation but a US colony at the time and Vietnam was only a colony of France in the 1940's, the backdrop of all this.

After the war US warships accompanied Chinese warships to reclaim the South China Seas island and reefs that were colonized by Japan during the war. The Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation are key.

These documents are proofs that the US and France agreed to the 9 dash line. At most the US could argue is that it sides with the Republic of China - Taiwan and the 11 dash line belongs to the ROC.

As for UNCLOS, no one has come up to argue the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation have been repealed by UNCLOS. It's nonsense. Setting forth the framework for the use and protection of the sea is not an attempt to define territory or disputed territory.

If the US wishes to modify historical documents, the US must officially and openly announce it to the world and China. It cannot unilaterally change historical records - Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation - not in an international rules based order.

-3 ( +0 / -3 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites