The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.Trump calls for Iran's 'unconditional surrender' as Israel-Iran air war rages on
By Parisa Hafezi, Jaidaa Taha and Maayan Lubell WASHINGTON/DUBAI/JERUSALEM©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
100 Comments
plasticmonkey
What an irresponsible dufus.
Who started this war? Israel did.
Hercolobus
World power consolidation, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and on going Iran, Russia. Then after, China, NK.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Again somebody that learned only from Putin. Writing checks he can't cash.
bass4funk
The Ayatollah is
No, Iran, start there.
Hercolobus
How does that work? You get attack then need to surrender without a fight?
Then tell that to Ukraine.
Yrral
Bibi ,the Isrealis creature of lies,he mask the righteousness of grace,a silver tongue that weaves deceit with cunning pace, he speaks of unity and strength,of Jewish loyalty and creed,While planting seed of discords, fulfilling its dark unspoken genocide deed,,his eyes like chips of frozen coal,reflect vacant stare,A hollowness that hints at horror lurking in his lair,he offers solace,under to weep,but hide a secret,he will not keep,a broken promise, broken ,trust betrayed,a knife held to the back this the currency, Israel trades stabbing America in the back
JJE
Iran is still in the fight. Just launched a defensive salvo.
Oil going up.
How much is bluster is the question.
GuruMick
Israel has been claiming Iran has a nuclear weapon plan since at least 2012.
Pretty slow plan.
There are far more issues at play here including Irans oil reserves and keeping Israel the dominant military power in the area.
Real politics....real ugly....
US and Israel have got the"ugly part " well secured.
JboneInTheZone
Iran did. Iran funds groups like Hamas who attacked Israel on 10/7. They also fund groups like the Houthis whose own motto is “death to Israel”. Maybe don’t fund extremist groups of you don’t want to get bombed lol
GuruMick
Pro Israeli commentators have forgotten the tens of millions of people world wide, including here in Japan , that PROTESTED ISRAEL CONDUCT OF THE GAZA WAR.
The various agencies we use in this world to determine law and justice seem also to have decided Israeli conduct of the war constitutes war crimes.
Not just me is it ?
JboneInTheZone
Tens of millions of people are wrong. A subject’s popularity doesn’t determine its moral correctness
Hamas was also accused of war crimes by those agencies. Do you accept them at they’ve committed war crimes? You won’t answer
bass4funk
It doesn’t matter what anyone thinks, they’re not responsible for Israel and it’s people and the Israeli government will do what any responsible government would do to protect its people and nation.
That depends on who we are talking about because there are many who also believe Israel is on the right side of history of this.
Lots of opinions.
wallace
The MAGA super supporter Republican politicians, like Marjorie Taylor Greene, want the US to stay out of it.
A majority of Republicans are opposed to the United States becoming involved in the conflict between Iran and Israel, according to a new poll.
Tamarama
How is this guy a US President?
WhatsAllThisThen
Trump sucks. I used to favor Trump over Biden/Obama. Trump is a war-mongering POS, same as Bush. The US uni-party needs to be toppled.
Yrral
The truth hurts people who supports,Jews that commit genocide in Gaza
Capuchin
Sorry, what's that happening just over your shoulder Mr Katz?
"Israeli tanks fired into a crowd trying to get aid from trucks in Gaza on Tuesday, killing at least 59 people
The incident was the latest in nearly daily large-scale killings of Palestinians seeking aid in the three weeks since Israel partially lifted a total blockade on the territory it had imposed for nearly three months."
https://japantoday.com/category/world/israeli-tanks-kill-59-people-in-gaza-crowd-trying-to-get-food-aid-medics-say
bass4funk
She has an opinion that’s good and healthy
John Fetterman thinks we should do whatever we can to help Israel
True, but they’re not the President, no one voted for Congress.
WoodyLee
""Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said meanwhile that Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could face the same fate as Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, who was toppled in a U.S.-led invasion and hanged in 2006 after a trial.""
It make NO DIFF. if the Iranian leader is dead or alive, there will be many taking the lead soon after his death just like all other leaders of the people.
Hamas leaders were killed and so is Hezbollah but the movement still alive, what Israel needs to do is to Get Rid of FOX Bibi first then start negotiating.
Wick's pencil
When it comes to Israel, Trump has been a juju he disappointment. They must have something on him.
JboneInTheZone
Hezbollah is the weakest its ever been now lol
Bob Fosse
maga sure flipped on that whole The US first and no warmongering bit.
Tokyo Guy
So let's say, just for argument's sake, that this (Israel and Iran) somehow gets resolved.
And then if Israel decides that it wants to pick yet another fight with (fill in the blank country), will Trump demand that (fill in the blank country) also unconditionally surrender as well?
Will Israel continue to pick fights on the assumption that the US will back every one of them?
I mean, yeah, Israel is the most technologically advanced country in that region, but you can only fight so many battles at once before you stretch yourself thin.
bass4funk
Not at all, no boots on the ground, so…
wallace
The US going to war is a decision by Congress, not the president.
The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war, and the extent of the president's authority to wade into conflict abroad.
Capuchin
The narcissistic orange mop can kiss goodbye to his Nobel Peace Prize with quality oration like that.
All caps? On social media? Can't see why that wouldn't work.
WhatsAllThisThen
@plasticmonkey
"What an irresponsible dufus.
Who started this war? Israel did."
I usually don't comment "this," but THIS.
JboneInTheZone
Who else would Israel try to “pick a fight with” and why?
plasticmonkey
Not what you said last year.
flip
flop
WhatsAllThisThen
Epstein has entered the chat.
geronimo2006
The plan is clear now. Forced regime change. I don't think the option of a negotiated peace is now possible as the current regime would be rightfully hell bent on getting nukes for self defence. The new world order under Trump is now might is right. This is how most authoritarian leaders behave when their popularity falls. Create a diversion such as a war while they suppress opposition at home. It's a page right out of Putin's playbook. But, I'm not sure it will be that easy. Is the regime that unpopular it will collapse like in Syria? Will there be chaos and will Russia meddle? I'm sure they will as they have big stake. Is this why the US cancelled recent talks with Russia? Trump rolls the dice.
JboneInTheZone
No. At its weakest point in 1948 Israel was able to defend itself against Egypt, Transjordan, Iraq, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. Keep in mind at this point in history Israel had almost 0 American help. Now you’re suggesting that an even stronger Israel, with U.S. support and fewer regional adversaries is going to be beaten? I’ll meet you back in reality anytime you want to join us
Tokyo Guy
No. At its weakest point in 1948 Israel was able to defend itself against Egypt, Transjordan, Iraq, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. Keep in mind at this point in history Israel had almost 0 American help. Now you’re suggesting that an even stronger Israel, with U.S. support and fewer regional adversaries is going to be beaten? I’ll meet you back in reality anytime you want to join us
I wasn't expressing a preference for either country, and will happily cede a point to someone who knows more about the subject, but is this still applicable in an age of more modern weapons that go boom?
JboneInTheZone
Israel has more weapons that go boom, better delivery capabilities of those weapons that go boom, and better defensive capabilities against weapons that go boom than any regional rival
bass4funk
None
itsonlyrocknroll
Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran Islamic extremism is solely/totally responsible for this devastating middle east war,
President Trump has sent a carrier strike group, I understand with full air support. To wreak havoc.
President Trump demands, "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!"
Iran has a choice to make,to unconditionally surrender, or possibliy suffer the same consequences as Iraq, Libya.
This is truly terrifying, the outcomes for Iran, its people are bleak ominous, however the moment Hamas, 7th October massacred, hostages taken, the rape slaughter of children, infants’ families.
Seed were sown for horrific retribution, for Gaza, for any hope of a two-state solution for the people of Palestine, now for Iran.
It is a tragedy, possibly more so than the Gulf wars in Iraq.
JboneInTheZone
This has failed every single time it’s been tried lol
rainyday
Trump looks like he is about to lead the US into another war in the Middle East.
Watch how fast his supporters flush everything he said about that sort of thing last year down the memory hole…
WhatsAllThisThen
Japan imports quite a lot of stuff from Iran, too.
https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/imports/iran
ohara
This has failed every single time it’s been tried lol
Yep!
ohara
This is the end for the Iranian regime. They brought it upon themselves.
Aly Rustom
Trump calls for Iran's 'unconditional surrender' as Israel-Iran air war rages on
Not going to happen. This will be a protracted war; maybe even years
WoodyLee
Bibi claimed that Iran poses 10 Nuke Bombs, but now Israeli officials are declaring that Iran does NOT posses any Nuke Bombs and that Bibi mislead Israelis and the world.
GuruMick
Aly....my guess is that Trump will have moved on " to another area in a day or so.
A protracted war with Israel will hurt Israel more than Iran.
Good....I hope the shekel falls of a cliff.
stormcrow
The deal maker at work!
The Iranians should jump for a deal like that!
theFu
The country that has a stated goal of destroying Israel and the US started this war. It has just finally gotten to the point that ignoring them cannot be allowed.
Trump has a 140 character limit on any thoughts he has. He can only understand simple issues and seeks simple solutions. Trump doesn't realize that Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution is when their hatred of Israel actually started. Prior to that, they were allies and Iran was one of the first countries to recognize Israel as a country. Not even 50 yrs.
The Khomeini fundamentalists in Iran changed everything. Since that time, Iran has been supporting a proxy war against Iran through Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza.
By removing Khomeini fundamentalists from power in Iran, perhaps peace in the region will be possible? This would dry up money and weapons getting to Hezbollah and Hamas, which would remove 3 anti-Israeli organizations from the region.
And it would probably end Iran's goal of nuclear weapons. Nuclear power needs 10% enriched uranium. Iran has reached 60% enrichment levels and was trying to get to 90%. This cannot be allowed, regardless of the cost. A world with terrorist having nuclear weapons cannot be allowed.
wallace
Netanyahu's claim that the attack was about preventing an immediate threat to Israeli national security is not just facetious, it's fictitious.
gaijintraveller
The US needs to control the irresponsible, out-of-control terrorist.
No not Iran, Israel is the terrorist causing wars everywhere.
Iran has managed to prove the Iron Dome is not inpenetrable.
Aly Rustom
That would be my guess too brother.
Oh absolutely.
I'll second that.
Aly Rustom
yup
TokyoLiving
Trump promised world peace, but we're much closer to a third world war..
Trump fell into the claws of the Zionist lobby; Zionism controls Trump. Zionism is going to lead us to a third world war..
itsonlyrocknroll
Netanyahu certanly has driven a ruthless political, military agenda, with undeniably horrific results.
Gaza is a pile of rubble, its people starving.
Possibly upwards of a hundred thousand Palestinian souls dead/buried under the rubble.
RichardPearce
What good is 'absolute air supremacy' when the only place you can land is the airfield or aircraft carrier of a country that then has to choose to either prevent you from taking off on another attack run, or losing their airfield or aircraft carrier?
Because if yesterday was all about Iran hitting Israel's weapons programs R and D, and choice military bases throughout the Occupied Territories, today could be about going after Israel's Air Force facilities (or the armored vehicles of its antioverthrow divisions).
Oh, wait, did the article, so full of details about what the Scofflaw regime has hit from the start of its sneak attack on somehow run out of room before it could provide much detail about what Iran hit while your reporter in Israel was being a glitched video saying 'we got the alarm that something was coming but we can't see, hear, of feel ANYTHING right now' again, and again, and again, and again...
okinawarides
Peter NeilToday 07:15 am JST Oh good, another war. Wait, do all countries starting with Iran have WMD’s.
We are seeing 2025 version of " we have proof Iraq has WMDs and is going to use them against us " in real time.
okinawarides
wallaceToday 07:40 am JST
The MAGA super supporter Republican politicians, like Marjorie Taylor Greene, want the US to stay out of it.
A majority of Republicans are opposed to the United States becoming involved in the conflict between Iran and Israel, according to a new poll.
No doubt majority of Americans prefer staying out of yet another foreign war.
HopeSpringsEternal
Unconditional surrender a great idea, as either way, the Iranian nuclear program is going to be destroyed, far better to do in a controlled safe manner, vs. war.
Iran can have civilian nuclear power, just no enrichment
NOT a war against Iran, rather military operation to remove a VERY dangerous nuclear weapons program, that creates an existential threat to the entire WORLD
UncleA
Trump’s mask is off.
Once sold to his base as the “peace president,” he's now revealed himself as a leashed attack dog, barking threats at Iran on behalf of the one country in the Middle East that actually has undeclared nuclear weapons, isn’t a signatory to the NPT, and has been bombing its neighbors for decades. But suddenly, Iran is the problem?
He's calling for “unconditional surrender” against a country under active attack, whose officials and civilians are being killed, and whose nuclear program has never been proven military in nature—confirmed again and again by both the IAEA and U.S. intelligence.
The only ones saying otherwise are the same ones who brought us Iraq’s “WMDs” with the infamous “Trust Me, Bro” intelligence file. The same ones whose interests are served by every war America fights—but who never bleed themselves.
Trump choosing that version of “intelligence” over his own agencies says it all. He’s not leading. He’s not protecting American interests. He’s being handled.
And if this escalates, he’ll be remembered not as a patriot, not as a fighter for peace or sovereignty—but as a traitor who dragged the U.S. into yet another war for someone else’s empire.
HopeSpringsEternal
Not one logical person outside Iran who believes Iranian nuclear weapons program will somehow enhance global safety and security, rather, just the OPPOSITE.
This program if allowed to go unchecked, threatens the very existence of civilization, as it will fuel a nuclear arm's race across the world, including in the Middle East.
Trumps position on Iran and their nuclear weapons program been clear for more than a decade, as has PM of Israel, #1 risk to the world, and so this military action being taken is not a surprise and is in fact long overdue.
okinawarides
geronimo2006Today 07:55 am JST
The plan is clear now. Forced regime change. I don't think the option of a negotiated peace is now possible as the current regime would be rightfully hell bent on getting nukes for self defence. The new world order under Trump is now might is right.
Now lets not pretend "might is right" is somehow a new concept. It was ever thus, whether there is a Republican or Democrat in the White House makes no difference. But sure, in this case Trump atm seems to be following the same principle.
bass4funk
Then that’s it for the country, everyone get out asap!
bass4funk
No, we’re not
No, Muslim antisemitism and jihadism will be
rainyday
President ignoring intelligence agencies telling him a country in the Middle East is not developing WMDs as he seemingly becomes obsessed with going to war with that country and effecting regime change in it.
Where have I seen this before…..
HopeSpringsEternal
Nobody wants war, especially open-ended, good news is this is not such a war, rather a specific military operation with a specific military objective, the permanent elimination of the Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program
jeffy
bass4funk Today 07:45 am JST
Yes, religio-political zealots. People who believe,
— Genesis 15:18–21
This is the reason why Israel, and Netanyahu in particular, have been itching for war with Iran for so long. It is no less religious zealotry than the actions of those whom they call zealots. And these zealots have nuclear capability. Anyone interested in America first should in no way support the zealotry of either side.
UncleA
@bass4funk
If you're still searching for the root cause of antisemitism, perhaps it’s time to look a bit closer to home. Often, it's not hatred that breeds resentment — it’s the arrogance of those who weaponize victimhood while silencing all critique. Actions have consequences, even for those who claim to be above reproach.
okinawarides
Interesting news, who to believe on this -
Iranian state television on Tuesday afternoon urged the country’s public to remove the messaging platform WhatsApp from their smartphones, alleging the app gathered user information to send to Israel.
In a statement, WhatsApp said “We do not track your precise location, we don’t keep logs of who everyone is messaging and we do not track the personal messages people are sending one another,” it added. “We do not provide bulk information to any government.
u_s__reamer
The US going to war is a decision by Congress, not the president.
The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war, and the extent of the president's authority to wade into conflict abroad.
Very true, but like international law and legal articles forbidding crimes against humanity, the laws of the land of the free are not worth the paper they are written on when they conflict with the interest of those who wield power in Washington.
Jimizo
Expressions like ‘a world on fire’ were used quite effectively to attack Biden’s administration.
A lot kicking off under Trump.
As mentioned earlier, Trump sounded more out of it at than usual at the G7 meriting.
Not the best person to have in charge at a time like this.
browny1
The King has called for an Unconditional Ultimatum - or else!!!
Pretty forceful rhetoric for a "non-involved" leader of peace.
Regardless Trump is involved to the hilt.
Marco Rubio - Secretary of State - official statement on March 1st.
I have signed a declaration to use emergency authorities to expedite the delivery of approximately $4 billion in military assistance to Israel. The decision to reverse the Biden Administration’s partial arms embargo, which wrongly withheld a number of weapons and ammunition from Israel, is yet another sign that Israel has no greater ally in the White House than President Trump.
Since taking office, the Trump Administration has approved nearly $12 billion in major FMS sales to Israel. This important decision coincides with President Trump’s repeal of a Biden-era memorandum which had imposed baseless and politicized conditions on military assistance to Israel at a time when our close ally was fighting a war of survival on multiple fronts against Iran and terror proxies.
The Trump Administration will continue to use all available tools to fulfill America’s long-standing commitment to Israel’s security, including means to counter security threats.
Trump is in this deep - way beyond any so called "just defensive actions".
HopeSpringsEternal
Doubtful, as there's a specific military objective, the permanent elimination of the nuclear weapons program.
Not territorial and conquest, rather surgical in nature.
Furthermore, there's no religious element in play, strictly SMART Global Risk Mgmt. to eliminate nuke proliferation
BertieWooster
So the U.S.A. is supporting Israel. Why doesn't the U.S.A. attack Iran directly if they hate them so much?
Fountain
“no boots on the ground”
Bass4funk, it’s not 1939. That’s not how all wars are fought now.
Nathaw
Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said meanwhile that Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could face the same fate as Iraqi President Saddam Hussein,
86 years old are barely able to walk. Whether he will be killed by someone or not, he has not much time left. No judge has ever given capital punishment who is barely able to stand straight. Unlike Saddam, Ayatollah is a religious leader like pope for their sect.
Some old people have cognitive impairment as well. They will be gradually pass away because of mental capacity decline.
There is only exception of Okinawa elderly who can still work in farms in advanced age. Even Trump is 79 yrs old he has fall down for climbing the Airforce one. Trump has struggled to stand straight in G7 meeting because of the strong wind.
No judge will sentence Trump harshly because of his age, mental capacity and physical condition.
Back in 2001, US toppled Afghanistan Taliban regime for changing modern and friendly government. Fast forward to 2025, Afghanistan is still ruled by Taliban after toppling Taliban despite spending fortune and sacrificing service men and women lives.
In fact Nathanyaho is a extremist war criminal. he should be punished for his crime in ICC like WWII Japanese general Hideki Tojo.
bass4funk
It is, nothing happened on our side, that’s a plus
Not really, once he fires that first shot, no, but if boots are on the ground, yes.
Tell Russia and Ukraine that.
bass4funk
I’m American First all the way, but when it comes to Israel, I’ll back them to the end.
GuruMick
Silly commentators thinking Israel doesnt sponser proxy groups could check Wiki "Israel state sponsored terrorism " for a lengthy history lesson.
Most recently funding Kurds to fight Turkey, against Turks, on Turkish land.
And look at all the EU and UK and USA "state sponsored " assistance in the multi billions flowing to Israel.
Raw Beer
Yes, israel should be forced to surrender unconditionally.
Yep, it's more like an Iron Sieve! And it will only get worse as they run out of the expensive rockets used by this system, and as Iran shifts from firing their old rockets to their brand new ones.
israel is finished, but what worries me is that they'll do anything to get the US to fight the war they started. Even if it means doing a false flag as they did (almost successfully) when they intentionally attacked the USS Liberty.
OssanAmerica
The U.S. absolutely should stay out of this Israel/Iran War. We have bigger fish to fry that affects our own security. To have the U.S. as a "ally" means that if you are attacked then we will help you. It doesn't mean that if you attack anoher country we are going to support you. If course Trump being the puppet of the Netanyahu regime will probably drag the U.S. into another 10-20 years of fighting in the sandbox. All while China and Russia move their chess pieces unhindered.
I hope Israel is prepared to compensate the world if Iran closes the Hormuz Strait.
browny1
bass - thanks for your replies.
Actually Trump is heavily involved as I posted above.
To declare that a country's involvement in war can only be decided by "boots on the ground" seems quite naive.
There are any number of other ways in which an adversary/ country - esp through executive order - can be directly engaged first hand.
Proxy is unavoidably complicit.
Trump's orders to quietly send 100s of Hellfire Missiles to Israel only days before the pre-emptive strike on Iran, - which were consequently used - would suggest involvement deeper than boots.
Peter14
If the US is not involved in the Israeli war with Iran, then how is it he is calling for Iran to surrender unconditionally, or at all? This makes no sense at all. It would be as if Fiji were calling on Iran to surrender unconditionally.
One must assume that America is involved and will make it much more obvious in the coming hours or days. No wars Trump is indeed joining hands with the criminal Netanyahu to conquer Iran. Perhaps he wants to move them all out of there, for their own safety, and build a big beautiful resort all over former Iran, now to be American Trumpland.
jeffy
bass4funk Today 10:23 am JST
Then not "all the way," since the needs of Israel take presidence. And when that need necessitates Americans must to go to war and die for Israel, oh well. But this is just par for the course.
https://youtu.be/Mzmtdwsef8s
Peter14
Quite a statement. Personally I cant back a nation gone rogue and committing genocide, ethnic cleansing and empire building by expanding its borders through use of force as Israel is doing under its current government, with its criminal leader. If any leader should be targeted for assassination, and that is a slippery slope to go down, not one I recommend, it would be sensible for that target to be the criminal in charge of all this conflict being persecuted by Israel.
Tokyo Guy
I’m American First all the way, but when it comes to Israel, I'll think whatever Trump tells me to.
Fixed it for ya.
Chabbawanga
So we going for a Libya style trainwreck, or an Afghanistan style trainwreck?
grund
Trump is in quite a bind here. He and his base doesn't want war, but at the same time the republicans are solidly behind Israel no matter what Israel does.
bass4funk
Look, it’s just not true that Americans are sent to war to die for Israel. That’s an exaggerated take. The U.S.–Israel relationship is real, they’re allies, they share intel, and they’ve got strategic interests in the region. But that doesn’t mean Israel comes first no matter what, but I support them. America supports a lot of countries, not just Israel. Think NATO, Japan, South Korea — we have deep ties all over the world. And when we go to war like Iraq or Afghanistan, it’s not because Israel asked. It’s way more complicated than that, involving national security, alliances, and broader global strategy.
And Yes, Israel gets U.S. aid. So do plenty of other countries. And sure, there’s lobbying — like there is in almost every area of government, so let’s not be hypocritical and complain when it involves Israel.
bass4funk
No, it's what I said, no need for you moderate my words and distort them, I was abudently clear about that.
wallace
Trump is in the eleventh hour of a direct US attack on Iran. The US military has been moved into the right locations. It has already cost many hundreds of millions without a single shot fired.
JboneInTheZone
There is literally 0 evidence of this. I’d ask you to post it but I know you can’t and you’ll just refuse to answer to your bogus claims like you always do
Yes. Allied nations are allowed to give eachother assistance. That’s how the civilized world works idiot
kohakuebisu
Let's kill the guy who put a fatwa on Iran developing a nuclear weapon. Dumb beyond belief!
That's it basically. Trump has stabbed his supporters in the back. I doubt even Dick Cheney would attack Iran, you have to go full John Bolton megahawk to go for it. Here's Trump himself on Twitter in 2019.
https://x.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1181905659568283648
We are getting this now because of full US capitulation, "appeasement" if you like, to Israel/Netanyahu. It says something when its now Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon etc. speaking the most sense.
jeffy
Tokyo Guy Today 11:06 am JST
I think this comment incorrectly assumes Trump's importance here and the power dynamics. It is the fanatical reverence for Israel that makes one throw reason out the window. Trump simply has to navigate the waters with all those dual-citizenship holders who have the same fanatical reverence. Let us not forget,
— Exodus 15:3
Enough is written there in "the good book" to know that one is reading an obviously religio-politcal work.
ohara
What good is 'absolute air supremacy' when the only place you can land is the airfield or aircraft carrier of a country that then has to choose to either prevent you from taking off on another attack run, or losing their airfield or aircraft carrier?
You reveal that you have zero understanding of the basics of warfare.
Aly Rustom
The Israelis are.
jeffy
bass4funk Today 11:29 am JST
You know what is an even more exaggerated take? Netanyahu's claims about the state of Iranian nuclear weapon capabilities. See the video for details:
https://youtu.be/Mzmtdwsef8s
No more foreign adventures for the United States military please. Put America first.
Aly Rustom
REPORT: Israel BLOCKS ESCAPE, Uses US Citizens As HUMAN SHIELDS