Japan Today
world

Trump orders release of last JFK, RFK, King assassination files

22 Comments
By Danny KEMP and Chris LEFKOW

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© 2025 AFP

©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.


22 Comments

Comments have been disabled You can no longer respond to this thread.

How about releasing the Epstein files?

That would be so much fun to see!

But of course Donald doesn't want people to see that he was involved in "acts" with minors.

RFK, JFK, and MLK files wouldn't show us anything we don't know already.

4 ( +11 / -7 )

How about releasing the Epstein files?

At a later date I’m sure.

That would be so much fun to see!

Absolutely, I agree

But of course Donald doesn't want people to see that he was involved in "acts" with minors.

Yeah, that didn’t happen, the Dems had 4 years to sift through the records, they desperately didn’t want Trump to win the Presidency, if Trump were involved with minors in any capacity and knowing how much the left hates Trump there is no way they would have ever sat on that information, no way.

RFK, JFK, and MLK files wouldn't show us anything we don't know already.

So then why did our government not release the files for decades if that’s true?

-2 ( +7 / -9 )

While his haters are distracted by nonsense, Trump just keeps adding to this list of promises kept.

-1 ( +9 / -10 )

Let's hope Cuba wasn't involved as we can't expect the current occupant of the White House to have a rational plan of action.

-4 ( +4 / -8 )

Hmmm.....

Fights in court to keep Jack Smith's cases in his insurrection and classified steal and stash from being released...

Releases things from 60 years ago....

Sure sounds like an obvious misdirection and deflection...

At least he didn't sell them to Putin or Xi...

1 ( +7 / -6 )

bass4funk

How about releasing the Epstein files?

At a later date I’m sure.

I doubt it. He's not likely to uncover his own dealings with Epstein.

Blacklabel

While his haters are distracted by nonsense, Trump just keeps adding to this list of promises kept.

And broken. He promised to open the Epstein files. He didn't.

-1 ( +6 / -7 )

He didn't

he hasn’t yet. It’s day 4, relax.

he has already kept probably 2 dozen promises in 4 days.

more are obviously coming.

-2 ( +5 / -7 )

Unlikely decent Cuba was involved. Certainly possible radical fascist anti-Revolution US-based Cuban exiles were. You know, the ones on the payroll of a certain agency. The failure of the illegal, non-UN sanctioned Bay of Pigs Invasion - which was a heinous assault upon a neighbour - probably created a hornets nest closer to home.

-4 ( +5 / -9 )

more are obviously coming.

To be blocked by judges who understand the constitution.

-2 ( +5 / -7 )

If a govt needs to keep a non-military secret more than 10-20 yrs, that govt has big issues and the people need to force laws to prevent it.

Secrets are bad for a democracy.

Secrets are what dictators use to hold power, because if the citizens and military actually know what's happening at the direction of the dictator, they'd organize and do everything they could to take him out of power.

-1 ( +7 / -8 )

theFu,

see, you got it right.

"Secrets are what dictators use to hold power....."

Donald Trump:

his medical records are a secret

his tax returns are a secret

his relationship with Kim and Putain is a secret

And the list continues!

3 ( +8 / -5 )

To be blocked by judges who understand the constitution.

and overruled by the Supreme Court.

-4 ( +4 / -8 )

The Constitution can be challenged and it can be amended.

Well well, you’ve changed your tune.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

The problem with these and others and this applies not just to the USA but similar "reports" and "investigations" in other countries, is that even though the conclusion that what was told to the public was/is correct, by withholding parts, they (the governments) create the environment that gives rise to speculation, conspiracies, off the wall theories, etc...

Now I do understand that in some cases a limited period of withholding some information for National security (perhaps 10 years or so) but 20 to 70 years seems excessive and gives even more time for more rumours and conspiracies to take hold.

Honestly if there was nothing nefarious in any of these cases then 10 years max 20 would have been sufficient for national security.

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

I doubt it.

We don’t know he just started

He's not likely to uncover his own dealings with Epstein.

Which would be nothing of interest in that regard

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

Well well, you’ve changed your tune.

I never changed anything

-5 ( +1 / -6 )

I wonder what is left in those files. They've had six decades to redact them.

-2 ( +3 / -5 )

Well well, you’ve changed your tune.

I never changed anything

Yes you did. You’ve posted countless times that the constitution is inviolate. Now you are admitting is could be mistaken.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

If they release the files, then do it without any redactions. They’re impossible to make sense out of with all of the redactions.

Who did it? IMO…The Mob with some help from the CIA, but it was mostly the Mob.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

"Trump orders release of last JFK, RFK, King assassination files.'

Great, let's now see who were the murderers and their children.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites