The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
© Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.UK's Starmer says Europe is at ‘crossroads in history’ as leaders agree to steps to Ukraine peace
By BRIAN MELLEY and EMMA BURROWS LONDON©2025 GPlusMedia Inc.
Video promotion
97 Comments
TaiwanIsNotChina
They should have acknowledged Trump's break with the civilized world by not mentioning the US in their resolutions. There is no point in dragging the infantile along.
Newgirlintown
Trump and Putin are bringing us all closer to WW3.
Underworld
Trump will be miffed with that.
Mickelicious
Great to see some maturity after Friday's clown show.
itsonlyrocknroll
Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer is deserves praise, credit.
Starmer brought Europe leadership together for a crucial summit.
Excuse my humour, I can't help wondering slouching Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk, like some iffy Uncle eyeing up the silverware.
Some dude
He's hardly exaggerating. Europe used to be able to assume that it was, by and large, on the same page as the US. That is now very much in doubt.
I don't know if Zelenskyy and Ukraine can afford to completely burn their bridges with the US, but if it's possible to do so, he should make it a top priority and work with Europe, Canada, Australia, etc...countries which don't have Kremlin-controlled toddler puppets in charge.
Newgirlintown
The ‘bust up’ was clearly a set up.
Bob Fosse
I guess we should thank jd and 47 for bungling it so badly they actually helped unite support for Ukraine.
JeffLee
Never thought I'd say this, but Starmer this weekend was reminincent of Churchill in 1940.
JJE
Why is Justin in the "Europe" photo?
bass4funk
No, but Zelenskyy is definitely not helping his country by staying on. It’s just not working out. Now if Europe has a better way of dealing with Putin, go ahead, they think they can take on the largest nuclear power on the planet, fine. If Ukraine won’t make serious concessions, It won’t end up well for them, over 7 million Ukrainians left and more are leaving each day. Europe thinks they can handle this, then do so, I wholeheartedly support it, we did enough, now Europe should do all the heavy work.
JJE
The EU brigade couldn't knock the head off a beer. There will be no EU 'peacekeeping' force in Ukraine or 'security guarantees' (NATO via the backdoor). Watch.
JJE
Starmer is not a Churchill or anything close. He had his portrait removed from the British parliament building. Trump had his bust moved back into the oval office.
Mr Kipling
Sorry to burst your bubbles but Europe does not have much to offer Ukraine. Ukraine's biggest problem is a lack of manpower to fight. Is the UK going to put frontline troops on the ground? Obviously no, but for arguments sake lets play along. Of the UK army less than 12,000 are combat troops. Enough to help hold the line at one of the fronts for a month or so. France, Germany are similar. No chance of advancing or taking Crimea..
Then we have munitions they can offer.
Ah_so
Someone had to assume leadership now that Trump has abdicated the role.
Underworld
bass4funk
Trump and Putin are bringing us all closer to WW3.
It's working out fine. He has more popularity now because Trump's and Vance's shameful bullying in the White House.
Better than kowtowing to Putin? Couldn't be worse than this clown show.
Underworld
Churchill was a colonialist and a racist.
But he didn't back the enemy in times of war.
wallace
Russian nuclear weapons are not a threat unless Putin decides to end the world. The UK and France also have nuclear weapons and Europe is protected by American ones.
Ah_so
Europe has a population four times the size of Russia, am economy ten times the size, two nuclear powers and armies that are not weakened by three years of war.
Three years in which Putin's army couldn't take more than 10% of Ukraine.
Russia will back down when anyone its own size stands up to it. It always has and it always will
iknowall
Europe has been anxious since Trump initiated direct peace talks with Putin, who had been isolated by most Western leaders since invading Ukraine three years ago.
That isolation has prolonged the war, resulting in Ukraine losing more land and more lives.
What has Europe done in three years to bring the war closer to an end? Granted, they were forced to be in partnership with Bungling-Joe-Biden during that time, but if none of those European leaders recognized his constantly diminishing capacity then Europe is in more trouble than we can see.
Ah_so
Given that Putin is now relying on North Korean troops to plug gaps in his forces, he needed this peace deal as much as anyone.
Whilst he has some inexplicable hold on Donald Trump, he cannot fool the rest of the world so easily.
This will cost Europe, but its economy is far larger than Russias. There is also $300bn of Russian money sitting in frozen bank accounts in Europe. So far just the interest on that is being given to Ukraine, but the total sum is nearly twice as much as the US has given to Ukraine.
Time to spend the Russian money to defend Ukraine.
wallace
Give Putin an inch and he will take a mile.
K3PO
Totally false. On initial invasions, ask Napolean and Hitler.
iknowall
As he had been doing the last three years.
Now, with Trump in charge, this war will come to an end.
OkinawaRider
I spot Justin Trudeau up there, Canada must have been annexed by the EU.
Bob Fosse
You know the UK is also not in the EU, right? Canada is a commonwealth country with close ties to Europe. The more the merrier.
bass4funk
So good, then I hope he and Europe don’t ask for anything. I pray that you are right
Then Zelenskyy should have kept his mouth shut and not say anything particularly in public.
Yes, especially with a country that has the largest nuke arsenal. So it’s better to stroke his ego, because no one else can stop him. Not Europe, so Zelenskyy either makes a deal or goes it alone, makes no difference to this administration.
Underworld
iknowall
Have you been following recent events?
Trump's peace deal is in tatters.
VoiceOfReason
People seem to think that any lack of support for Ukraine is support for Putin. This is simply not the case.
Underworld
VoiceOfReason
It is in this case.
The White House is completely on Putin's side.
iknowall
Norway was also there. But you know Norway is also not in the EU, right?
And did you know Norway is not a commonwealth country?
But I agree--the more the merrier.
They're going to need it!
VoiceOfReason
It's frustrating to see how much the USA has given to Ukraine, far more than Europe, and here the USA wants peace and an end to the bloodshed and Europe wants to puff out its chest and act like top dog as if they had really done anything for Ukraine these past years.
Yes Europe has given money to Ukraine. But like NATO, Europe wants the USA to pay for everything so now Europe as all about "We're taking the moral high ground and maybe we can shame the USA into taking on more of this burden" strategy
wallace
Norway and Canada are NATO members.
Underworld
bass4funk
With nukes, it really doesn't matter how big your arsenal is. If we start using them, everybody loses.
Oh, Putin can be stopped. His economy is weak and he can't keep fighting this war. Just like the lessons of Afghanistan, superior force doesn't always win.
That's the shameful part of this. Trump has turned the US into a traitor.
Underworld
VoiceOfReason
Neville Chamberlain just wanted peace too. How did that work out?
Maybe, Europe has learned from their mistakes.
Not at all. Zelenskyy was offering rare earth minerals.
I think they want to shame the US for siding with Putin.
wallace
Between 24 January 2022 and the end of 2024, Europe as a whole spent $138.7bn on Ukraine. In the same period, the United States spent $119.7bn,
WoodyLee
Europe has NO CHOICE but to do and follow what Pres. Trump wants and that is PEACE.
The other choice is to carry on with this meat grinder ALONE.
kohakuebisu
Churchill knowingly starved several million Bengalis to death and extended WWII through an inept insistance on invading Italy before France. This extended the war by possibly up to a year. A lot of people died and extremely bad things happened in that time. He made nice speeches on the wireless, but they don't make him a hero. He was booted out of office as soon as the war ended.
Getting back to this meeting, but this war has to end and as soon as possible before major escalation. Zelensky's comments about not ceding land seem nuts to me, they chose to fight and have lost, and that will come with consequences. Zelensky himself is the result of US neocon meddling in Ukraine, and should not be viewed as some organic representation of what Ukraine was several years ago, to say nothing of what the same land mass is today. This is not going to end with Ukraine having the same borders as in 2016.
Blacklabel
great! Zelensky, his issues and his incessant demands? all yours!
The very next sentence:
“He said any plan would require strong U.S. backing”.
no thanks.
geronimo2006
The break is clear, and Trump is deeply compromised. His (MAGAs) hostility of Ukraine and admiration of Putin was on full display. Starmer and others understand Europe will have to go it alone. No chance of US negotiating a just and lasting peace. Fortunately Trumps tariffs, and disdain for him and his policies, is driving them together and empowering support for Ukraine. Definitely a turning point - perhaps, the end of the beginning?
WoodyLee
Pres. Trump did it again, Rattle the cages of Europe like Netanyahu's so something can be done to end the fighting FAST,
WELL DONE SIR.
TaiwanIsNotChina
It's not working out for Trump-Putin, you can be honest about that.
The leader of a country is not allowed to say anything in public? How about the manchildren Trump-Vance keep their yaps shut for once?
Yes, I remember when Reagan said it was important not to anger the Soviet Union because it had the largest nuclear arsenal. Not.
bass4funk
Short-range missiles can hit a precise target.
How?
So why is Russia thriving
https://youtu.be/tnIiUpOKwtE?si=GjCLqAZFIp3yX685,
Biden, yes, that withdrawal…
If you think so, I disagree
TaiwanIsNotChina
4x the GDP of russia. Where there is a will there is a way.
Underworld
kohakuebisu
That's why the US can't act as a traitor now.
What comments are you referring to. Zelenskyy is willing to ceasefire with Russia occupying parts of Ukraine. But he isn't willing to say that that land is Russian. That's perfectly reasonable.
There has been no neocon meddling in Ukraine. Any meddling has been from Russia.
Sure. Not for the peace deal. But that doesn't mean that Ukraine will give up sovereignty of that land.
WoodyLee
""Never thought I'd say this, but Starmer this weekend was reminincent of Churchill in 1940.""
Not even close,
Sir Churchill LED Britain to VICTORY and not defeat.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Europe has given more than the US. Look it up. And just because the US gave a lot of weapons and zero troops doesn't give it the right to declare how the war is going to end.
Jimizo
I’m not a fan of Starmer but he was quite impressive here.
Then again, doesn’t take much to look statesmanlike and decent in comparison to the ones in the tank for Putin.
Just don’t have more love and admiration for people who invade other people’s countries. A low bar, but that’s where Trump and Vance have set it.
TaiwanIsNotChina
Because the US didn't chicken out for that one.
TaiwanIsNotChina
I bet NK has some supermarkets to show to rubes on the internet.
We're going to have fond memories of the Biden strength when Odessa is in russian hands, the US is kicked out of Europe and East Asia, and Taiwan belongs to the PRC.
Underworld
bass4funk
With nukes, it really doesn't matter how big your arsenal is. If we start using them, everybody loses.
And all sides have them. As soon as one is fired, we all lose.
Oh, Putin can be stopped.
Take the Russian reserves in Europe, and use it to pay for weapons for Ukraine.
Putin can't sustain this war.
His economy is weak and he can't keep fighting this war.
It's not. Interest rates are 21%, bankruptcies are piling up. Inflation is high, around 10%, more for food. The only way that GDP is up, is because of all the war spending.
Just like the lessons of Afghanistan, superior force doesn't always win.
I was referring to Russia's withdrawal.
But Biden's withdrawal was mostly Trump's blunder. Negotiating with the Taliban and not the Afghan government. Oh wait, that's what he is doing now. You can see why this won't bring peace.
That's the shameful part of this. Trump has turned the US into a traitor.
What has Trump demanded of Russia?
JeffLee
Ukraine isn't defeated either, in case you haven't checked. How's life in the disinformation sphere?
FizzBit
Looks like the Europeans are moving backwards. Centuries of war between them. Unfortunately, they now have nukes. Party on EU dudes!
Larry Lacky
@ TaiwanIsChina
Teflon Don is trying to make peace, is he not?
C’mon Man!
WoodyLee
"" Starmer told the BBC before the summit that he does not trust Russian President Vladimir Putin but does trust Trump.""
We can all agree on NOT trusting Pres. Putin due to past dealings, BUT something has to be done to end these killings on both side, 3 years has passed and all we see is DEATH and DESTRUCTION with Ukrainian and Russian young women and men paying the price for these GAMES while the rest are just WATCHING,
As one politician put it " All fine as long as NATO soldiers are not dying ".
itsonlyrocknroll
Joe Biden presidency provided Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy with the logistics, the weaponry, political support, every encouragement to stand firm to face the aggressor.
Two indisputable facts, President Putin invaded, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the people of Ukraine have been brutally violated.
Putin has sanctioned heinous atrocities.
President Trump, calls to President Putin offers a possible path to a peace deal.
The UK Guardian broadsheet has stated
*Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, sought to move the conversation forward from his difficult meeting with the US president, Donald Trump, on Friday saying it was “best left to history”, as he signalled Ukraine’s readiness to sign the minerals deal and hoped for “constructive” talks with the US administration on the next steps.*
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer clearly offers an intermediary role.
Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, its people, will face an ominous future, surrender.
Only US milltary strength, political influence can provide a backstop from a road that rightfully could lead to oblivion.
I think Europe has be given a second chance, its citizens people security is, must be understood, as Europe's sole 21st century responsibility.
JJE
Elephant in the room is the EU 'peacekeeping' force won't enjoy a UN mandate and requires a 'security guarantee' for its own welfare.
Look at photo 2 and 6 - the Household on ceremonial in their bearskin hats in seasonal.
Starmer and his pals aren't holding any cards. Two of them in the main photo have been rejected by their own voters and are on the way out (the German in back middle and Justin with the grin). This is all completely laughable. Only EU territory changing hands is from the woman on the left second row and not from Russia/China.
About the only thing that makes any common sense here is they are all on top of the government's wine cellars. These people are addicted to pointless meetings.
Toblerone
It is yet another Europe problem, with the same protagonists dragging the world to yet another World War.
Let’s keep this one an all-Europe affair.
Jimizo
The same protagonists? What are you talking about?
I’d stick to fashion tips.
OkinawaRider
The White House is completely on Putin's side.
White House is trying to end this terrible war to and bring peace to Ukraine.
This POTUS is on Putin's side , he is a Kremlin asset and other nonsense is just anti Trump forces political rhetoric.
stormcrow
This is the end of NATO. The USA has now sided with the enemy. How tragic! All because of one man.
isabelle
Starmer is showing real leadership here, and I applaud his efforts.
I've been disappointed in him thus far, since he has gone soft on China (refusing to condemn the Xinjiang Genocide, despite vowing to do so; and preventing a trip to the UK by Tsai Ing-wen), but he is doing exactly the right thing here, along with Macron and others.
Europe has not forgotten the causes of WWII, even if the Appeaser in Chief over in the White House neither understands nor cares.
I'veSeenFootage
He's just trying to make it look like the unprovoked russian agression on Ukraine is actually a European problem, caused by Europe, that could drag the world into a new war.
In other words, he's repeating russian propaganda.
OkinawaRider
TaiwanIsNotChina , It's not working out for Trump-Putin, you can be honest about that.
What we know with certainty is that it definitely did not work our for Biden strategy , we can all be honest about that.
4x the GDP of russia. Where there is a will there is a way.
There is not enough will by European taxpayers to keep funding the war until Ukraine " gets its territories back".
That's why the US can't act as a traitor now.
US is not a traitor.
bass4funk
I see
Not sure what that has anything to do with his disastrous withdrawal, but yeah, go on that tangent.
JJE
Polish guy front row right has an odd posture - this because he broke his left leg in a skiing accident recently. The brace is visible on said limb in the main photo.
isabelle
Elephant in the room is that Putin's unilateral, unprovoked war of conquest and vanity doesn't enjoy a UN mandate.
FYI, when one of the permanent members of the Security Council commits heinous aggression in this way, the free world does not wait for it to vote against itself at the UN before acting.
Interesting to see you're using the "cards" analogy, just like your operative in the White House.
bass4funk
Short-range missiles can hit a precise target.
Then so be it
How?
So why aren't they doing that? Yeeees?
So why is Russia thriving
https://youtu.be/tnIiUpOKwtE?si=GjCLqAZFIp3yX685,
And yet, people are thriving and surviving, please dig some more.
How is Afghanistan doing these days with our weapons?
Wait, so now you want to hold Trump in charge for Zelenskyy's mistake because after all the buck stops with Trump and while Biden was President, the buck doesn't stop with him because it was Trump's blunder? Like I said, it is always fun and amusing talking to Europeans about geopolitical politics, never a dull moment, ever. Lol
Ask him.
JJE
Not an analogy. Just reality and the whole EU group here is not playing a strong hand by any measure. All indicative of desperation and confusion.
TaiwanIsNotChina
How long did the war in Afghanistan last? Ukraine's territory is not a game for you to ragequit and russian deaths are deserved deaths.
BB
MAGAs who still can't see what pathetic little treasonous bullies DJT and JDV were in that meeting at some point have to admit that's who they are as well. Europe is now the leader of the free world. DJT is Putin's stooge.
TaiwanIsNotChina
You are an expert on the russian economy and military to know their situation now. Fascinating.
There is a will to keep Ukraine sovereign with the territory it has, though, which more than we can say for King Trump.
OkinawaRider
stormcrowToday 09:54 am JST This is the end of NATO.
That is overly dramatic, of course this isn't the end of NATO.
Looks like the Europeans are moving backwards. Centuries of war between them. Unfortunately, they now have nukes. Party on EU dudes!
It would be better for everyone if they talked it out instead of nuking it out. That is what Trump WH is trying to achieve.
There has been no neocon meddling in Ukraine.
Now lets be honest, of course there has been.
TaiwanIsNotChina
The EU force requires only the shooting stop long enough to get them in.
Yrral
You foreigner are on your own, American got more internal problems and you are not a priority,only way to deal.with an American,is through coercive psychological legal means,
OkinawaRider
isabelleToday 10:11 am JST..... just like your operative in the White House.
Proof of the Kremlin operative in the White House accusation would be just splendid.
BB
This is from the Kremlin on Sunday - and who do you think is responsible for making this happen?
"The new administration is rapidly changing all foreign policy configurations," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told state television on Sunday. "This largely aligns with our vision."
JJE
Any foreign force entering the theatre will be targeted by Russian command. Will look like Iskander ballistics and more. Hiding under some flag won't prevent this. The main line of contact is over 1000km. Starmer and Macron and the others can maybe scrape up a 25 thousand man "force" or there abouts. These people really don't have a clue and at most will backfire in spectacular fashion and only make Russia more and more angry.
Cephus
These knuckle dragging so called European leaders where have they been for the past 2 years? Peace before minerals not minerals for peace
falseflagsteve
Another big mistake by Starmer in a tragic attempt to boost his popularity. The war must end without his childish meddling.
Underworld
bass4funk
But Biden's withdrawal was mostly Trump's blunder.
What? Zelenskyy hasn't made a mistake.
The facts are the facts. The buck stops with mostly, but not totally, Trump for the Afghan deal, because he is the one that brokered it.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/30/us-afghanistan-war-military-pullout-report-biden-trump
I'm sure it is. I'm not a European.
What has Trump demanded of Russia?
Nothing. If he had, we would know about it.
Nathaw
Starmer is a new Winston Churchill of UK. Only UK and France and Turkey had fought with Russia in history. US has never ever fought with Russia in close combat or long range since 1776. UK has 225 nuclear warheads. France has 290 nuclear warheads. Russia has 5580 nuclear warheads. However delivery, air defenses system and speed will decide the outcome. Battle of Crimea has been distant memory. In those old days, there were only two options. March or Die!
On March 28, 1854, Great Britain and France declared war on Russia, joining the Ottoman Empire in a conflict that became known as The Crimean War. European powers had not fought a major war against each other since the Napoleonic Wars which ended in 1815. The Crimean War was an imperial war fought on many fronts, including modern day Ukraine, the Baltic Seas, and the Kamchatka Peninsula of East Asia.
HopeSpringsEternal
Big problem for Ukraine and war support is corruption DOGE's uncovering. US voters won't like it. EU politicians and voters will be strongly influenced by DOGE findings.
Probably most important however is falling support for war inside Ukraine, lack of ability to recruit sufficient manpower for UA etc. EU has to take into to account realistic 'viability' of Ukraine to even continue this war.
DJT made his position clear, Ukraine has no military path
Underworld
HopeSpringsEternal
Not this again. DOGE has found nothing. It's a corrupt organization pretending to be a department, and they have found no fraud, and no savings.
And, what they are doing is illegal.
Russia has similar recruitment problems.
Well DJT doesn't understand war, peace or foreign affairs, so he can make an ignorant position as clear as he wants, but it doesn't mean we have to listen to it.
mrtinjp
Starmer said he will later bring a more formal plan to the U.S. and work with Trump.
Why not do it w/o US.. now's the ideal opportunity..
mrtinjp
Ukraine isn't defeated either
Well all of Ukraine was never invaded in the first place as such not defeated..
Underworld
bass4funk
But Biden's withdrawal was mostly Trump's blunder.
Trump was president when the deals about the Afghan withdrawal were made. I'm not absolving Biden of responsibility either. All I'm saying is that the deal Trump made was a bad deal.
So why would we trust him to do another "peace deal"?
What? Zelenskyy hasn't made a mistake.
So what was his mistake?
Nothing. If he had, we would know about it.
This was in reference to: That's the shameful part of this. Trump has turned the US into a traitor.
mrtinjp
Starmer brought Europe leadership together for a crucial summit
He does not have the means to realize the peace, he needs to talk to Trump and ensure Zelenskyy apologizes, than only the peace path will work.
kurisupisu
Starmer pledged to supply more arms to defend Ukraine, announcing that the UK will use 1.6 billion pounds ($2 billion) in export financing to supply 5,000 air defense missiles.
.
And what will those arms be used for?
To attack Russia.
As soon as Ukraine received Storm
Shadow missiles from the UK, they were used to access Russian airspace!
Where is talk of a ceasefire?
When are the Ukrainians and EU states going to discuss peace?
No doubt the dead Ukrainian soldiers will shortly be replaced by Europeans, willingly or unwillingly.
Conscription could well become a thing.
Who are the winners?
It’s all about making profit for European weapons’ manufacturers.
HopeSpringsEternal
Besides political calculations, EU officials must take into account importance of the US to their safety and the damage a Ukraine war policy split would do to NATO, not to mention economic and investment considerations.
No analyst thinks EU will go it alone on Ukraine, besides lacking sufficient military capacity, above considerations too weighty, Trump's driving the Ukraine war decision.
DJT Committed to Peace, easy way using his plan or the hard way where the EU and Ukraine go it alone and fail.
u_s__reamer
What a disgrace the floundering milquetoast Starmer is using an invitation to a second state visit from King Charles to kiss Trump's backside! Felonious presidents and sexual predators should be persona non grata in the palace.
HopeSpringsEternal
Many people in EU and their politicians LIKE DJT's 4 Step Ukraine Peace Plan; Rapid Ceasefire, Codify Peace Agreement, Deploy Peacekeeping troops not under the command of NATO and extensive reconstruction and economic redevelopment taking DECADES.
DJT laid out above on Friday at Oval Office for entire world, including EU politicians, to clearly understand.
Big Problem for EU politicians opposing DJT, they have no clear roadmap, just more status quo expensive, deadly and risky war with a UA that's losing badly.
OkinawaRider
TaiwanIsNotChina, How about the manchildren Trump-Vance keep their yaps shut for once?
They are the President and VP and they speak out for US interests.
Almost as much as you, fascinating.
John-San
The USF Preferring to stand with Russia and Israel whose leaders are wanted to face charges of genocide against humanity. Lick Lick, bend the knee USF.
Underworld
mrtinjp
Starmer brought Europe leadership together for a crucial summit
What are you talking about? Apologize for what?
What peace path? Trump has None.