Fos comments

im so glad you are interested in everything I have to say over multiple topics.

You need to consider that commissions are quite substantial from the US industrial military complex, to spread manipulative narrative over foreign media outlets. That is how the warlords of Wall Street keep profiting from the numerous conflicts, asking their reps to show up and instructing them what to say

Russian intelligence?

It sounds more like propaganda from the US big industrial military complex to guarantee more weapons orders to please the warlords of Wall Street.  After all, the US administration has a long track record of spinning false narratives

If there had been no decision in April 2008 to expand Nato into Ukraine the picture in Europe today and the situation regarding the European Russia relations would look fundamentally different and we would have a peaceful Europe.

The catastrophic decision by George W. Bush and Condolezza Rice to expand Nato was totally ill conceived: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0epyHOz-Pbs

But Ukraine isn't a member of NATO, so that can't be right.

That's right, but it would have been if it was for the warmongering US administration.

Do you need subtitles for this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0epyHOz-Pbs

What is clear from the beginning is that Russia could not have the US nuclear missiles bases in Ukraine, same as Washington would not allow Moscow to hold military equipment in Canada. It is a very elementary principle of satellite countries and big empires.

And again.Any actual evidence for this?"

A reminder that in the course of the 20th century alone, Washington has participated in 39 armed conflicts, or one every three years, and since 2000 it has engaged in at least 12 wars, the equivalent of one every two years. 

China has neither the intent nor the capability to attack Japan, and the US is a dangerous ally because of the above history of aggression

Truth is the only military risk that we face from China is if we continue as a proxy for the US in its endless wars

Gotta love the China haters.

You have to feel sorry for the Okinawa residents, strongly opposed to the presence of US soldiers.

Washington and Tokyo invariably call for “enforcement of strict discipline” after every incident, something which the media calls a useless joke.

And here we are talking about China !?

Lets’ not forget that under the defense strategy, pressed by Washington, Japan aims to eventually double its annual military spending to around 10 trillion yen ($63 billion), making it the world’s No. 3 military spender after the United States and China.

Truth is If there had been no decision in April 2008 to expand Nato into Ukraine the situation in Europe today and the situation regarding the European Russia relations would look fundamentally different and we would have a peaceful Europe. The catastrophic decision by George W. Bush and Condolezza Rice to expand Nato was totally ill conceived: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0epyHOz-Pbs

A few numbers to understand the role of US big industrial military complex to initiate the war in Ukraine: 

the White House has sent over 115 billions of dollars (officially) of weapons to Ukraine from the beginning of the conflict, in the meantime the US financial stocks rose to all time high, since the top five arms manufacturers in the world are all American,

US swiftly took over Russian gas charging four times as much, benefiting Texas oil companies. Not to mention that American LNG is highly polluting the global environment, something that legacy media does not reveal. Since the outbreak of war in Ukraine and disruptions in pipeline flows from Russia, the United States has increased LNG sales to Europe by 14%

President Zelensky granted permission to the likes of Black Rock, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Elon Musk's Starlink, promising: “Everyone can become a big business by buying up Ukrainian assets”.

And now the US state department will start looting the country, by seizing control of Ukraine's lucrative natural resources, from minerals to rare earth, profiting once again the usual vultures who speculated on this huge disaster.

Russia is the only offensive alliance in the region.

As we all know the US State department disinformation has a track record of promoting manipulative narratives.

Global military expenditures in 2024 rose 9.4 percent from the year before to a record $2.72 trillion, an international security think tank said Monday, logging the steepest hike since it began compiling the data in 1988.

By country, the United States topped the list with outlays of $997 billion, up 5.7 percent,

On the other hand Russia boosted spending to an estimated $149 billion.

So less than one fifth!

A reminder that US stock markets rose to all time high in the last year since the top 5 weapons manufacturers in the world are all Americans and their aim is to destabilize as many countries as possible with the continuing warmongering:

https://www.sipri.org/visualizations/2024/sipri-top-100-arms-producing-and-military-services-companies-world-2023

There aren’t US nuclear missile bases in Ukraine

Never say never. Ukraine needs protection

A bit of contradiction here. US military transcripts at full strength I suppose :) 

It takes just a listen to a leaked phone call to understand how United States was behind the illegal coup. Lets hear from Victoria Nuland's role in overthrowing the democratically elected Ukrainian President Yanukovych....

She was Former Spokesperson for the United States Department of State in February 2014

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoW75J5bnnE

The ground for this conflict was prepared by US securocrats in the 1990s when Russia was emerging from the dissolution of the USSR. The problem was the eastward expansion of NATO and Russia’s exclusion from this process.

 Ukraine isn’t part of NATO.

There is a difference:Ukraine would be part of Nato if it was for Washington i.e. another client of US big industrial military complex.

What is clear from the beginning is that Russia could not have the US nuclear missiles bases in Ukraine, same as Washington would not allow Moscow to hold military equipment in Canada. It is a very elementary principle of satellite countries and big empires.

As we all know the United States played a key role in generating and perpetuating this terrible conflict in Ukraine since the Bucharest Nato meeting in 2008: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0epyHOz-Pbs

Let’s put into context few things here, to understand the good old US administration:

the White House has sent over 115 billions of dollars (officially) of weapons to Ukraine from the beginning of the conflict, and the US financial stocks rose to all time high, since the top five arms manufacturers in the world are all American, making billions of profits for the warlords of Wall Street.

wash swiftly took over Russian gas charging four times as much, benefiting Texas oil companies. 

Not to mention that American LNG is highly polluting the global environment, something that legacy media does not reveal. Since the outbreak of war in Ukraine and disruptions in pipeline flows from Russia, the United States has increased LNG sales to Europe by 140 percent.

In the meantime, in a speech to a US corporate lobby group, president Zelensky thanked Black Rock, JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Elon Musk's Starlink, promising: “Everyone can become a big business by buying up Ukrainian assets”.

And now the US state department will start looting the country, by seizing control of Ukraine's lucrative natural resources, from minerals to rare earth, profiting once again the usual vultures who speculated on this huge disaster.

> Yet Russia is solely responsible for this war.

Let's not forget that Washington has masterminded the coup in February 2014 against the democratically elected government in Kiev, after the planned seizure of Russia's historic, legitimate warm-water naval base in Crimea failed. The Russians defended themselves, as they have done against every threat and invasion from the west for almost a century.

If there had been no decision in April 2008 to expand Nato into Ukraine the situation in Europe today and the situation regarding the European Russia relations would look fundamentally different and we would have a peaceful Europe. The catastrophic decision by George W. Bush and Condolezza Rice to expand Nato was totally ill conceived: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0epyHOz-Pbs

China has stated its intention to take Taiwan

Sure, ‘stated its intention’ and not a world about the warmongering of US in Eastern Europe and Gaza.

You got to raise your game. We are talking about skirmishes of Filipino fishermen here: history tell us the U.S has done it before to justify one of the most immoral conflict and pictures of outposts released by American satellites who have all the interest to sell the image of China as "the next biggest threat". In the meantime the big US military industrial complex signs arms deals for hundreds of billions dollars of weapons to neighbor Taiwan, South Korea or Japan. The US lobbies do not care whether Japan government need to tackle social issue, they want you to believe that anti Beijing hysteria. 

And yet despite the hostile activities, countries like Malaysia and Indonesia signs trade agreement with Beijing. Australian voters punished hardly the conservatives with their harsh rhetoric on Beijing. Perhaps it is time to ask the US big industrial military complex to provide you with an update on geopolitical issues?

Once again this conflict reveals an unbelievable hypocrisy: regional or global powers act based on balances of power and not on motives that have to do with morals and ethics.

If there had been no decision in April 2008 to expand Nato into Ukraine the situation in Europe today and the situation regarding the European Russia relations would look fundamentally different and we would have a peaceful Europe. The catastrophic decision by George W. Bush and Condolezza Rice to expand Nato was totally ill conceived: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0epyHOz-Pbs

On the contrary, China -Japan relations should be based firmly in Japans pacifist principals of non confrontational co-existence based on mutual respect and peace. Something China can learn from Japan.

Gotta love the China haters :)

A brief recap of history books, as opposed to the usual US military transcripts

Of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, who represent the great powers, only China has not fought a war in 40 years. In contrast to China, in the last three decades, America has fought a war or been involved in military actions every year.

In the course of the 20th century alone, Washington has participated in 39 armed conflicts, or one every three years, and since 2000 it has engaged in at least 12 wars, the equivalent of one every two years. 

The anti-Beijing hysteria is clearly being led by the United States which is not concerned that China will attack other countries, but is worried that its world hegemony is being challenged

Over the years, China has emerged as Asia key trading partners through training programs, infrastructure projects and other forms of cooperation, forging strong ties rooted in openness, pragmatism, and win-win collaboration. Asia needs shared prosperity and mutual respect, not a one-sided power play. 

Unlike United States of America’s warmongering nature, Japan-China relationships should be based on Beijing principles of peaceful co-existence, mutual benefit and win-win cooperation.

United States are an imperialist country trying to safeguard its own interests. To put it with the Political Analyst and Columbia University Professor Jeffrey Sachs: ‘The United States are the most lawless and dangerous country in the world by far’

United States are an imperialist country trying to safeguard its own interests.

To put it with the Political Analyst and Columbia University Professor Jeffrey Sachs: ‘The United States are the most lawless and dangerous country in the world by far’

> Trump is sending Zelensky the Patriot missiles.

Which proves our point. And the warlords of Wall Street are sipping cognac by the pool in Florida. 

The new statistics from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute say that the 41 companies in the Top 100 are based in the United States, and recorded arms revenues of $317 billion, half the total arms revenues of the Top 100 and 2.5 per cent more than in 2022. Since 2018, the top five companies in the Top 100 have all been based in the USA.

Let’s not forget that 73% of Ukrainians voted in 2019 for Zelensky's peace platform, to make peace with Donbas and Russia by implementing the Minsk agreement. But then US-funded nationalists and fascists (and "NGOs" financed by Western governments) threatened Zelensky to abandon his peace mandate. These threats were made in the open but the legacy media did not report on it.

If the Minsk peace agreement had been implemented, Russia would not have invaded. The nationalists became NATO's veto power against any peace agreement, as our governments could argue that Ukraine decides when to negotiate.

The claim that Russia would not accept a compromise and was responsible for the failure of diplomacy was always a lie to sell a long war. If the opponent does not want peace, then war is the only solution and we must fight Russia to the last Ukrainian.

As Henry Kissinger once said: "It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but what is perceived to be true."

How easy (and tragic) to decide what is relevant and what you cannot answer :)

Albania and Croatia (2009); Montenegro (2017); North Macedonia (2020); Finland (2023); and Sweden (2024). 

Let’s not forget what former US Assistant Secretary of State for European Victoria Nuland said about the United States investing $5 billion in more than 20 years in Ukraine via the CIA, USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Money was allocated for “fair elections, to fight corruption and to develop the energy sector”. In 2014, Washington overthrew the legally elected president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych and installed a puppet government that had been selected by the neoconservatives in the White House. 

https://www.zeit.de/politik/ausland/2015-05/ukraine-usa-maidan-finance/seite-2

NATO hasn't expanded in Eastern Europe since 2004.

As we all know NATO further expanded after the Cold War, betraying the agreement with Russia, adding the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland (1999); Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia (2004); Albania and Croatia (2009); Montenegro (2017); North Macedonia (2020); Finland (2023); and Sweden (2024). 

And that is despite the promises made by the previous US administration to Gorbachev not to advance “one inch to the West”.

It is important to remember that the Pentagon contributes for about 80% of all the military equipment to Nato. So, I don’t think there is too much to add here

A brief history recap from official documents, away from US military transcripts and investors notes

As we all know even the then NATO Chief in September 2023, Jens Stoltenberg, admitted that NATO Expansion was key to Russian invasion of Ukraine. Here are Stoltenberg’s revealing words:

 “The background was that President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021, and actually sent a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign, to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what he sent us. And was a pre-condition to not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that.

Russia demanded the fulfillment of the U.N.-backed Minsk II Agreement, which called for autonomy of the ethnic-Russian Donbas, not a Russian claim on the territory. Yet instead of diplomacy, the U.S. armed, trained, and helped to organize a huge Ukrainian army to make NATO enlargement a fait accompli.

Gotta love the China haters

Japan partnering with China is the right move, which means less chances to deploy precious means to the constant warmongering campaign of United States of America. Beijing’s economy can drive to peace and prosperity in the continent including South Korea and all the neighboring countries

Look at the evidence

As we all know the United States played a key role in generating and perpetuating this terrible conflict in Ukraine since the Bucharest Nato meeting in 2008: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0epyHOz-Pbs

We all know that the ground for this conflict was prepared by US securocrats in the 1990s when Russia was emerging from the dissolution of the USSR. The problem was the eastward expansion of NATO and Russia’s exclusion from this process.

There is no clear or present danger for Japan to be attacked by China. Analysts who understand a bit of geopolitics will tell you that.

And yet we see, day in day out, reps from the US big industrial military complex posting desperate appeals to more military spending.

A brief recap of history for our new readers, to understand the lack of knowledge on the real danger of the White House, trying to wage the next war in Asia, after catastrophe in Eastern Europe and the mass killings in Gaza. Both being fought with American weapons.

Of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, who represent the great powers, only China has not fought a war in 40 years. In contrast to China, in the last three decades, America has fought a war or been involved in military actions every year.

In the course of the 20th century alone, Washington has participated in 39 armed conflicts, or one every three years, and since 2000 it has engaged in at least 12 wars, the equivalent of one every two years. 

Gotta love the China haters

It seems pretty clear that the only thing it will be rolled back is the obligation to spend billions of dollars in American weapons, and stick to more reasonable budget expenditure; i.e restoration of trade and prosperity with the rest of Asian countries, including China. The rejection of the conservatives was a clear signal that Aussies did not like the anti China rhetoric imposed by Washington. As much as the big US industrial military complex will force Canberra how to spend their money the country will keep suffering.

Gotta love the China haters 

At every single meaningful opportunity the US big industrial military complex instructing their reps to spread manipulative narrative against Beijing and force Tokyo government to claim something they themselves do not believe it happened. 

A reminder that under the defense strategy, pressed by Washington, Japan aims to eventually double its annual military spending to around 10 trillion yen ($63 billion), making it the world’s No. 3 military spender after the United States and China.

All American weapons: so the more fear you spread the more commissions on arm sales

It is quite clear the Australian citizens do not want to pick sides: conservative’s anger against China was brutally rejected, and yet these days nobody wants to partner with the current US leader and be slapped with the next military package from Washington, exacerbating tensions in Asia.

Roll back to modern time instead of referring to 1947 or 1967, almost 70 years ago where another type of catastrophe took place. Netanyahu, a criminal wanted by the ICJ, said it loud and clear: he is not even thinking of a two state solution, he never did. And his extreme right wing cabinet is even more radical organizing violent repressions in the West Bank authorizing the settlers to steal land and commit crimes. We say it again: modern day Israel is a “blight on the conscience of humanity.”